ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2019
Management of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC): an Evolving Treatment Paradigm.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world clinical outcomes of apalutamide versus abiraterone with androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer treated with apalutamide versus abiraterone acetate: a head-to-head analysis of real-world patients in the USA.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Article
- Overall Survival with Apalutamide Versus Enzalutamide in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Discrete-Choice Experiment to Understand the Preferences of Patients with Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in the USA, Canada, and the UK.The patient · 2023Article
- Impact of non-regional lymph node metastases accurately revealed onEJNMMI research · 2023Article
- Achieving Consensus for Management of Hormone-Sensitive, Low-Volume Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Italy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Patient Preference Studies for Advanced Prostate Cancer Treatment Along the Medical Product Life Cycle: Systematic Literature Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Review
- Effects of etoposide combined with cisplatin on prognosis of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who failed castration treatment.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Screening of hub genes and evaluation of the growth regulatory role of CD44 in metastatic prostate cancer.Oncology reports · 2021Article
- Survival following upfront chemotherapy for treatment-naïve metastatic prostate cancer: a real-world retrospective cohort study.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2021Article
- The changing landscape in the management of newly diagnosed castration sensitive metastatic prostate cancer.Investigative and clinical urology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementCombination systemic therapy is now standard of care for all men with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Patients with mHSPC should be treated with standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and abiraterone acetate with prednisone or docetaxel (chemohormoanl therapy) unless there are contraindications to combination therapy. Based on the Chemohormonal Therapy Versus Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial for Extensive Disease in Prostate Cancer (CHAARTED) study subgroup analysis, chemohormonal therapy may be most beneficial in men with high-volume disease burden, as men with low-volume metastatic disease do not appear to experience a survival benefit with chemohormonal therapy, while abiraterone in combination with ADT appears to be beneficial across both disease volume subgroups. Decisions regarding whether to use chemohormonal therapy or abiraterone and ADT for men with mHSPC should integrate consideration of volume of disease burden, quality of life effects, duration of therapy, and patient preferences for treatment as there is no formally powered prospective head-to-head comparison of these options demonstrating superiority of one approach over the other. Treatment of the primary tumor with radiation should be considered in men with de novo low-volume metastatic disease as radiation is associated with prolonged survival and a tolerable toxicity profile. Men with de novo high-volume metastatic disease do not appear to have improved survival with radiation of the primary tumor. Numerous clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate treatment approaches that may benefit men with mHSPC. Radical prostatectomy in men with mHSPC in combination with optimal systemic therapy is currently being assessed in a clinical trial, but should not be considered outside of a clinical trial. Metastasis-directed therapy with radiotherapy directed at metastatic lesions is still investigational, but can be considered in clinical trials in men with oligometastatic disease. Multiple studies are enrolling worldwide for men with mHSPC, and these should be considered for all interested patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.