Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286272›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2019

Carcinoid Syndrome: Updates and Review of Current Therapy.

Kira Oleinikov, Shani Avniel-Polak, David J Gross, Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neuroendocrine Tumors: Clinical, Histological and Immunohistochemical Perspectives and Case Report-Mature Teratoma in a 16-Year-Old Girl.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kira OleinikovNeuroendocrine Tumor Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, Division of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, P.O.B. 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.
Shani Avniel-PolakNeuroendocrine Tumor Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, Division of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, P.O.B. 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.
David J GrossNeuroendocrine Tumor Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, Division of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, P.O.B. 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.
Simona Grozinsky-GlasbergNeuroendocrine Tumor Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, Division of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, P.O.B. 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel. simonag@hadassah.org.il.
Hadassah Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementCarcinoid syndrome (CS) is a complex disorder caused by functional neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This debilitating disease is characterized by hyper-secretion of biologically active substances eliciting major hormonal symptoms burden and fibrotic changes that are often challenging for management. There have been a number of insights that have substantially advanced treatments since the introduction of somatostatin analogs (SSAs). Second-line treatments are needed in a substantial proportion of patients with advanced disease that have uncontrolled hormone secretion on the highest labeled doses of SSAs. International guidelines suggest several available options including dose escalation of SSAs, interferon alpha, everolimus, radionuclide therapy, liver-directed therapies, and the novel tryptophan hydroxylase 1 inhibitor, telotristat ethyl. The clear preference of one second-line therapy over the other is not stated since their relative and long-term efficacy are largely unknown, and standardized approach of hormonal response assessment is lacking in the literature. In the clinical setting, the treatment of CS is guided in conjunction with patients' performance status, tumor origin, grade, stage, and growth rate, with regard to both anti-hormonal, as well as anti-proliferative effect. There is an unmet need for further well-designed randomized placebo-controlled and head-to-head studies that systematically assess CS symptom control and biochemical response following a specific intervention.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDisease ManagementHumansMalignant Carcinoid SyndromeTreatment OutcomeCarcinoid syndromeNeuroendocrineTreatment

Identifiers

PMID31286272
OpenAlexW2957086506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.