ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020
Defining the patient experience in medical oncology.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thresholds for clinical importance to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-COMU26 communication questionnaire.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Empathy, access, and delays: determinants of oncology care satisfaction in Polish academic and nonacademic hospitals.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Gender differences in cancer care experiences in Switzerland: a multicentre cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Nurses' Perceptions of Communication in an Oncology Hospital Care: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis of the Results of Monitoring the Quality of Services in Oncological Treatment, Conducted as Part of the Pilot Project of the National Cancer Network for Lung Cancer in 2019-2023, in Poland.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Patient-Nurse Communication in an Oncology Hospital Setting: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Patients' and clinicians' knowledge in cancer-related cognitive impairment and its implications: current perspective.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Review
- The experience of surgical cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic at a large cancer centre in London.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- How Can We Improve Patient-Clinician Communication for Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer?European urology open science · 2024Article
- Croatian National Cancer Patient Experience Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Illness experience and coping styles of young and middle-aged patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHigher patient satisfaction is associated with improved health outcomes, treatment adherence, and quality of life. The goal of this study was to explore oncology patients' perceptions on their hospital experience, focusing on the quality of care in medical oncology.
methodsA qualitative and quantitative study design was implemented with a sample of 58 patients at Smilow Yale New Haven Hospital. Data were collected from patient interviews and observation of rounds.
resultsTwo themes emerged: hospital experience and physician communication skills. Within hospital experience, subthemes identified include: attended to (49%), facility/staff (35%), nurses (33%), long wait time (29%), doctors (20%), coordination of care (18%), unnecessary medical procedures (10%), medications (6%), night awakenings (4%), pain (4%), not getting better (4%), and decreased mobility (2%). Within physician communication skills, subthemes identified include: involving the patient and/or family in the care process (41%), method of information sharing (18%), lack of coordination of care (15%), use of medical jargon (10%), attending to patient's needs (8%), and lack of patient's perspective (8%). Patients reported that effective engagement of patients in the care process and attending to patient-specific needs were desired qualities in their hospital experience as well as patient-centered communication with their physician. The quantitative data supported qualitative results with 72% of patients giving the highest score in overall satisfaction with their patient experience.
conclusionPhysician attentiveness or lack thereof is a defining aspect of the quality of patient experience and physician communication. The results are intended to inform clinical and operational interventions that care providers might incorporate into practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.