Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286234›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Defining the patient experience in medical oncology.

Ashley Odai-Afotey, Andrea Kliss, Janet Hafler, Tara Sanft

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Thresholds for clinical importance to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-COMU26 communication questionnaire.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The experience of surgical cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic at a large cancer centre in London.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Croatian National Cancer Patient Experience Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley Odai-AfoteyYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. Ashley.odai-afotey@yale.edu.
Andrea KlissYale New Haven Hospital, Smilow Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
Janet HaflerYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Tara SanftYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · USYale New Haven Hospital · US

Funding

NIH HHS 5T35DK104689-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHigher patient satisfaction is associated with improved health outcomes, treatment adherence, and quality of life. The goal of this study was to explore oncology patients' perceptions on their hospital experience, focusing on the quality of care in medical oncology.

methodsA qualitative and quantitative study design was implemented with a sample of 58 patients at Smilow Yale New Haven Hospital. Data were collected from patient interviews and observation of rounds.

resultsTwo themes emerged: hospital experience and physician communication skills. Within hospital experience, subthemes identified include: attended to (49%), facility/staff (35%), nurses (33%), long wait time (29%), doctors (20%), coordination of care (18%), unnecessary medical procedures (10%), medications (6%), night awakenings (4%), pain (4%), not getting better (4%), and decreased mobility (2%). Within physician communication skills, subthemes identified include: involving the patient and/or family in the care process (41%), method of information sharing (18%), lack of coordination of care (15%), use of medical jargon (10%), attending to patient's needs (8%), and lack of patient's perspective (8%). Patients reported that effective engagement of patients in the care process and attending to patient-specific needs were desired qualities in their hospital experience as well as patient-centered communication with their physician. The quantitative data supported qualitative results with 72% of patients giving the highest score in overall satisfaction with their patient experience.

conclusionPhysician attentiveness or lack thereof is a defining aspect of the quality of patient experience and physician communication. The results are intended to inform clinical and operational interventions that care providers might incorporate into practice.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicationFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOncologistsPhysician-Patient RelationsQuality of LifeYoung AdultOncologyPatient experiencePatient satisfactionPhysician communication

Identifiers

PMID31286234
OpenAlexW2962196741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.