ArticleBiological cybernetics2019
Frequency-dependent responses of neuronal models to oscillatory inputs in current versus voltage clamp.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frequency-dependent coupling in response to oscillatory inputs in minimal networks of electrically coupled nodes: Gap junction networks and spatially extended neurons.Biological cybernetics · 2026Article
- A linearized modeling framework for the frequency selectivity in neurons postsynaptic to vibration receptors.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Distinct mechanisms underlie electrical coupling resonance and its interaction with membrane potential resonance.Frontiers in systems biology · 2023Article
- The voltage and spiking responses of subthreshold resonant neurons to structured and fluctuating inputs: persistence and loss of resonance and variability.Biological cybernetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Action potential generation in neurons depends on a membrane potential threshold and therefore on how subthreshold inputs influence this voltage. In oscillatory networks, for example, many neuron types have been shown to produce membrane potential ([Formula: see text]) resonance: a maximum subthreshold response to oscillatory inputs at a nonzero frequency. Resonance is usually measured by recording [Formula: see text] in response to a sinusoidal current ([Formula: see text]), applied at different frequencies (f), an experimental setting known as current clamp (I-clamp). Several recent studies, however, use the voltage clamp (V-clamp) method to control [Formula: see text] with a sinusoidal input at different frequencies [[Formula: see text]] and measure the total membrane current ([Formula: see text]). The two methods obey systems of differential equations of different dimensionality, and while I-clamp provides a measure of electrical impedance [[Formula: see text]], V-clamp measures admittance [[Formula: see text]]. We analyze the relationship between these two measurement techniques. We show that, despite different dimensionality, in linear systems the two measures are equivalent: [Formula: see text]. However, nonlinear model neurons produce different values for Z and [Formula: see text]. In particular, nonlinearities in the voltage equation produce a much larger difference between these two quantities than those in equations of recovery variables that describe activation and inactivation kinetics. Neurons are inherently nonlinear, and notably, with ionic currents that amplify resonance, the voltage clamp technique severely underestimates the current clamp response. We demonstrate this difference experimentally using the PD neurons in the crab stomatogastric ganglion. These findings are instructive for researchers who explore cellular mechanisms of neuronal oscillations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.