Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286211›Full record

ArticleBiological cybernetics2019

Frequency-dependent responses of neuronal models to oscillatory inputs in current versus voltage clamp.

Horacio G Rotstein, Farzan Nadim

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biological cybernetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Horacio G RotsteinFederated Department of Biological Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology and Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Farzan NadimFederated Department of Biological Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology and Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA. farzan@njit.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4144-9042

Funding

REGULATION OF NEURONAL OSCILLATIONS BY SYNAPTIC DYNAMICSR01MH060605 · NIMH · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Dirk Martin Bucher, Farzan Nadim · 2001 to 2026
$6.6M
The role of axons in neural codingR01NS083319 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BUCHER, DIRK MARTIN, NADIM, FARZAN · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060605NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Action potential generation in neurons depends on a membrane potential threshold and therefore on how subthreshold inputs influence this voltage. In oscillatory networks, for example, many neuron types have been shown to produce membrane potential ([Formula: see text]) resonance: a maximum subthreshold response to oscillatory inputs at a nonzero frequency. Resonance is usually measured by recording [Formula: see text] in response to a sinusoidal current ([Formula: see text]), applied at different frequencies (f), an experimental setting known as current clamp (I-clamp). Several recent studies, however, use the voltage clamp (V-clamp) method to control [Formula: see text] with a sinusoidal input at different frequencies [[Formula: see text]] and measure the total membrane current ([Formula: see text]). The two methods obey systems of differential equations of different dimensionality, and while I-clamp provides a measure of electrical impedance [[Formula: see text]], V-clamp measures admittance [[Formula: see text]]. We analyze the relationship between these two measurement techniques. We show that, despite different dimensionality, in linear systems the two measures are equivalent: [Formula: see text]. However, nonlinear model neurons produce different values for Z and [Formula: see text]. In particular, nonlinearities in the voltage equation produce a much larger difference between these two quantities than those in equations of recovery variables that describe activation and inactivation kinetics. Neurons are inherently nonlinear, and notably, with ionic currents that amplify resonance, the voltage clamp technique severely underestimates the current clamp response. We demonstrate this difference experimentally using the PD neurons in the crab stomatogastric ganglion. These findings are instructive for researchers who explore cellular mechanisms of neuronal oscillations.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsBiological ClocksBrachyuraMembrane PotentialsNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesImpedance profileNeural oscillationsResonanceSub-threshold resonance

Identifiers

PMID31286211
PMCPMC6689413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.