ReviewDer Radiologe2019
[MR and CT arthrography in cartilage imaging : Indications and implementation].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microinstability of the hip: a systematic review of the imaging findings.Skeletal radiology · 2020Pooled it
- Photon-counting CT versus energy-integrating detector and flat-panel CT for cadaveric wrist arthrography with additional tin filter dose reduction.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- A novel MRI contrast agent NaGdFScientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of conventional MR arthrography and 3D volumetric MR arthrography in detection of cartilage defects accompanying glenoid labrum pathologies.Skeletal radiology · 2024Article
- Semiquantitative index of symptomatic minor instability of the lateral elbow at CT arthrography (SMILE index): clinical applicability and reproducibility study.European radiology · 2024Article
- [Ligamentous injuries of the ankle joint : Importance of radiological imaging procedures].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- [Ligamentous injuries of the ankle joint : Importance of radiological imaging procedures].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Overuse-related instability of the elbow: the role of CT-arthrography.Insights into imaging · 2021Review
- Inter-Rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Comparison to Computed Tomography and Wrist Arthroscopy in SLAC and SNAC Wrist.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Back Propagation Neural Network-Based Ultrasound Image for Diagnosis of Cartilage Lesions in Knee Osteoarthritis.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
- Gadolinium-hyaluronic acid nanoparticles as an efficient and safe magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent for articular cartilage injury detection.Bioactive materials · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe imaging of chondral pathologies is an essential part in the work-up of acute and chronic joint diseases. Besides conventional MR imaging, CT and MR arthrography are well-established methods in evaluating articular cartilage. The application of these techniques requires knowledge of indications and safe injection procedures by the performing radiologist. PURPOSE: Our goal is to describe the techniques of cross-sectional arthrographies of different joints, give an overview of general and joint-specific considerations for practical application as well as provide typical indications for cartilage imaging. MATERIALS AND
methodsA selective PubMed literature search concerning "arthrography", "CT arthrography", "MR arthrography", "arthrography cartilage", "arthrography wrist", "arthrography elbow", "arthrography shoulder", "arthrography hip", "arthrography knee", "arthrography ankle", "arthrography complications", "arthrography imaging guidance" "osteochondral lesion", "cartilage imaging" and "cartilage lesion" was performed. RESULTS AND
conclusionCT and MR arthrography are valuable and safe tools in cartilage imaging. They are useful to verify and specify chondral pathologies, usually after conventional MR imaging, and have an important role in evaluating the stability and therefore in therapeutic decision making of osteochondral lesions. CT arthrography is not only a substitute technique in case of MR contraindications, it can be advantageous in small joints (wrist, elbow, ankle) compared to MR arthrography due to its higher image resolution. Fluoroscopic guided joint puncture is still the most commonly used image guidance method, but the role of ultrasound is steadily increasing. Joint traction in MR arthrography is a promising technique to improve cartilage visualization, though it is not yet used in clinical routine imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.