ReviewDer Nervenarzt2019
[Gene therapies for neuromuscular diseases].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Allocation of single-use drugs in children in global compassionate use programs].Ethik in der Medizin : Organ der Akademie fur Ethik in der Medizin · 2022Article
- Review
- Development of a novel severe mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy with respiratory distress type 1: FVB-nmd.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor a long time the treatment of neuromuscular diseases was considered to be purely symptomatic. Due to new technologies in recent years novel causal forms of treatment could be developed. Gene therapies for spinal muscular atrophy, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, myotubular myopathy and hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type 1A are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Initial preliminary results are promising and the first preparation onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi (Zolgensma®) for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy has recently been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
objectiveThis review describes the principles of gene therapy, summarizes the interim results published so far and provides an overview of currently active or soon to be initiated gene therapy trials.
conclusionGene therapies have the potential to significantly influence the course of neuromuscular diseases. First positive intermediate results have been published and the first treatment has recently been approved in the USA. Long-term data on sustained effects and toxicity of gene therapies are not yet available. These novel treatment options will present new challenges for the healthcare systems concerning diagnosis, treatment and reimbursement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.