Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286065›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2019

Systematic discovery of conservation states for single-nucleotide annotation of the human genome.

Adriana Arneson, Jason Ernst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pervasive cryptic selection in the human noncoding genome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Computational Evidence for Digenic Contribution ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Predicting 3D Genome Organization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Single-nucleotide conservation state annotation of the SARS-CoV-2 genome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adriana Arneson1Bioinformatics Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.
Jason Ernst1Bioinformatics Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4026-7853

Funding

1/2 Genomic Strategies to Identify High-impact Psychiatric Risk VariantsU01MH105578 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FREIMER, NELSON B., GESCHWIND, DANIEL H · 2014 to 2018
$8.5M
"Ribonomics" of Gene Regulation to predict Innate Immune ResponsesU01HG007912 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BLACK, DOUGLAS L, HOFFMANN, ALEXANDER · 2015 to 2017
$5.8M
Deciphering the Relationship between Substance Use and Psychiatric Disorders from Whole Genome Sequencing DataDP1DA044371 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ERNST, JASON · 2017 to 2021
$2.3M
Epigenomic control of RNA splicingR01ES024995 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HOFFMANN, ALEXANDER, XING, YI · 2014 to 2015
$616k
Biomedical Big Data Training GrantT32CA201160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PELLEGRINI, MATTEO · 2015 to 2015
$264k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA201160NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007912NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA044371NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES024995NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH105578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative genomics sequence data is an important source of information for interpreting genomes. Genome-wide annotations based on this data have largely focused on univariate scores or binary elements of evolutionary constraint. Here we present a complementary whole genome annotation approach, ConsHMM, which applies a multivariate hidden Markov model to learn de novo 'conservation states' based on the combinatorial and spatial patterns of which species align to and match a reference genome in a multiple species DNA sequence alignment. We applied ConsHMM to a 100-way vertebrate sequence alignment to annotate the human genome at single nucleotide resolution into 100 conservation states. These states have distinct enrichments for other genomic information including gene annotations, chromatin states, repeat families, and bases prioritized by various variant prioritization scores. Constrained elements have distinct heritability partitioning enrichments depending on their conservation state assignment. ConsHMM conservation states are a resource for analyzing genomes and genetic variants.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanChromatinCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyEpigenomicsGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansMarkov ChainsMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultivariate AnalysisNucleotidesPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsChromatinNucleotidesComparative genomicsEvolutionary geneticsGenome informatics

Identifiers

PMID31286065
PMCPMC6606595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.