Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286062›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2019

Control of biosilica morphology and mechanical performance by the conserved diatom gene

Stefan Görlich, Damian Pawolski, Igor Zlotnikov, Nils Kröger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Stomata biosilica andChemical science · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Genetic engineering in diatoms: advances and prospects.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Progress and challenges in CRISPR/Cas applications in microalgae.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The molecular basis for pore pattern morphogenesis in diatom silica.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefan GörlichB CUBE Center of Molecular Bioengineering, CMCB, TU Dresden, Am Tatzberg 41, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Damian PawolskiB CUBE Center of Molecular Bioengineering, CMCB, TU Dresden, Am Tatzberg 41, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Igor ZlotnikovB CUBE Center of Molecular Bioengineering, CMCB, TU Dresden, Am Tatzberg 41, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Nils KrögerB CUBE Center of Molecular Bioengineering, CMCB, TU Dresden, Am Tatzberg 41, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8115-4129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The species-specifically patterned biosilica cell walls of diatoms are paradigms for biological mineral morphogenesis and the evolution of lightweight materials with exceptional mechanical performance. Biosilica formation is a membrane-mediated process that occurs in intracellular compartments, termed silica deposition vesicles (SDVs). Silicanin-1 (Sin1) is a highly conserved protein of the SDV membrane, but its role in biosilica formation has remained elusive. Here we generate

Indexed as

MutationCell WallCRISPR-Cas SystemsDiatomsMembrane ProteinsMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMorphogenesisMutagenesisPhenotypePlasmidsPromoter Regions, GeneticSilicon DioxideMembrane ProteinsSilicon DioxideBiomineralizationCell wallMutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID31286062
PMCPMC6599040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.