ArticleArthroplasty today2019
Relationship between surgical balancing and outcome measures in total knees.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Total Knee Arthroplasty and Intra-Articular Pressure Sensors: Can They Assist Surgeons with Intra-Operative Decisions?Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of the study was to investigate the accuracy of balancing which could be achieved at total knee surgery and its relation to functional outcomes.
methodsDuring surgery, the forces on the medial and lateral plateaus were measured at 10-15 degrees flexion in 101 patients, using an instrumented tibial trial, with equal forces being targeted. Of the initial 101 cases, 71 cases completed all follow-up visits to 1 year. At each follow-up visit, the function was measured using the Knee Society Scoring System, and varus and valgus laxity angles were measured.
resultsThe mean medial/(medial + lateral) compartmental force ratio was 0.52, with a standard deviation of 0.09. The total contact force was 217 Newtons, with a standard deviation of 72 Newtons. No correlations were found between the functional scores and the compartmental force ratio or total contact force. However, the mean varus and valgus laxity angles, 2.8 and 2.3 degrees, respectively, were very close to the angles of normal intact knees.
conclusionsThe likely reason for the lack of correlation of function was that the large majority of the balancing ratios were within the range 0.4-0.6 but with a wide spread of functional scores typical of total knee study groups. However, the normal varus and valgus angles achieved at follow-up indicated that equal balancing in early flexion was a reasonable surgical target. Using instrumented tibial trials enabled accurate and consistent balancing values to be achieved, as well as normal varus and valgus laxity angles, which may be important in obtaining optimal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.