Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286005›Full record

ReviewMovement disorders clinical practice2019

Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Mutations in Parkinson's Disease-Related Genes: A Systematic Review.

Lais Machado de Oliveira, Egberto Reis Barbosa, Camila Catherine Aquino, Renato Puppi Munhoz, Alfonso Fasano, Rubens Gisbert Cury

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Does genetic testing remain relevant in advanced Parkinson's disease?Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  3. What's in a name? reframing advanced Parkinson's disease as a multidimensional state.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lais Machado de OliveiraThe Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, Division of Neurology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1980-6755
Egberto Reis BarbosaMovement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Camila Catherine AquinoDepartment Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1643-9117
Renato Puppi MunhozThe Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, Division of Neurology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Alfonso FasanoThe Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, Division of Neurology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Rubens Gisbert CuryMovement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
University Health Network · CAUniversidade de São Paulo · BRImpact · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), and careful selection of candidates is a key component of successful therapy. Although it is recognized that factors such as age, disease duration, and levodopa responsiveness can influence outcomes, it is unclear whether genetic background should also serve as a parameter.

objectivesThe aim of this systematic review is to explore studies that have evaluated DBS in patients with mutations in PD-related genes.

methodsWe performed a selective literature search for articles regarding the effects of DBS in autosomal dominant or recessive forms of PD or in PD patients with genetic risk factors. Data regarding changes in motor and nonmotor scores and the presence of adverse events after the stimulation were collected.

resultsA total of 25 studies were included in the systematic review, comprising 135 patients. In the shorter term, most patients showed marked or satisfactory response to subthalamic DBS, although leucine rich repeat kinase 2 carriers of R114G mutations had higher rates of unsatisfactory outcome. Longer term follow-up data were scarce but suggested that motor benefit is sustained. Patients with the glucosidase beta acid (

conclusionsSubthalamic DBS results in positive outcomes in the short term in patients with Parkin,

Indexed as

deep brain stimulationgeneticsParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID31286005
PMCPMC6592794
OpenAlexW2947226834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.