Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285997›Full record

ArticleBiomolecular detection and quantification2019

The kinetic requirements of extreme qPCR.

Adam L Millington, Jessica A Houskeeper, John F Quackenbush, James M Trauba, Carl T Wittwer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecular detection and quantification, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Making Molecular Diagnostics Faster.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Rapid Cycle and Extreme Polymerase Chain Reaction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Rapid SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Assay for Low Resource Settings.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam L MillingtonDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, United States.
Jessica A HouskeeperDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, United States.
John F QuackenbushDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, United States.
James M TraubaDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, United States.
Carl T WittwerDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The kinetic requirements of quantitative PCR were experimentally dissected into the stages of DNA denaturation, primer annealing, and polymerase extension. The temperature/time conditions for 2 stages were kept optimal, while the other was limited until the amplification efficiency decreased as measured by an increase in quantification cycle (Cq). Extension was studied in a commercial capillary LightCycler®. Using a rapid deletion mutant of Taq (KlenTaq

Indexed as

Cq, quantification cycleExtreme PCRHigh speed meltingHSM, high-speed meltingMicrofluidicsPCR kineticsSNV, single nucleotide variantsTm, melting temperature

Identifiers

PMID31285997
PMCPMC6591793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.