Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285980›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical trials2019

Efficacy of Mobile Phone Short Message Service (SMS) Reminders on Malaria Treatment Adherence and Day 3 Post-Treatment Reviews (SMS-RES-MAL) in Kenya: A Study Protocol.

Ambrose O Talisuna, Dejan Zurovac, Sophie Githinji, Amos Oburu, Josephine Malinga, Andrew Nyandigisi, Caroline Oh Jones, Robert W Snow

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ambrose O TalisunaDepartment of Public Health Research, KEMRI-Welcome Trust Research Program, Kenya.
Dejan ZurovacDepartment of Public Health Research, KEMRI-Welcome Trust Research Program, Kenya.
Sophie GithinjiDepartment of Public Health Research, KEMRI-Welcome Trust Research Program, Kenya.
Amos OburuDepartment of Public Health Research, KEMRI-Welcome Trust Research Program, Kenya.
Josephine MalingaDepartment of Public Health Research, KEMRI-Welcome Trust Research Program, Kenya.
Andrew NyandigisiMalaria Control Unit, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Caroline Oh JonesDepartment of Public Health Research, KEMRI-Welcome Trust Research Program, Kenya.
Robert W SnowDepartment of Public Health Research, KEMRI-Welcome Trust Research Program, Kenya.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K007351/1Wellcome Trust 079080Wellcome Trust 092654Wellcome Trust 203077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile phone short messaging services (SMS) have been investigated in health information reporting, provider performance, drug and diagnostic stock management and patient adherence to treatment for chronic diseases. However, their potential role in improving patients' adherence to malaria treatment and day 3 post treatment reviews remains unclear. METHODS/

designA "proof of concept" open label randomised controlled trial will be conducted at four sites in Western Kenya. Principal research questions are: 1) Can mobile phone SMS reminders improve patient adherence to malaria treatment? 2) Can mobile phone SMS reminders improve day 3 post treatment reviews? Eligible caregivers (n=1000 per arm) of children under five years old with uncomplicated malaria will be randomly assigned (one to one) to: a) the current standard of care (provider counselling and health education); and b) the current standard of care plus SMS reminders. Within each arm, caregivers will be further randomized to three different categories. In categories 1 and 2, 300 caregivers per arm per category will be visited at home on day 1 and 2 of follow up respectively, to measure appropriate timing and adherence of the second Artemether-Lumefantrine (AL) dose and doses 3 and 4. Further, caregivers in categories 1 and 2 will be required to come to the health facility for the day 3 post treatment reviews. Finally, in category 3, 400 caregivers per arm will be visited at home on day 3 to measure adherence for the full AL course. Each category will be visited at home only once to avoid biases in the measures of adherence as a result of home consultations. Primary outcomes will be adherence to the full AL course (category 3), as well as, the proportion of patients reporting back for day 3 post treatment reviews (categories 1 and 2). The primary analysis will be intention-to-treat. Costs of the intervention will be measured over the period of the intervention, and a cost-effectiveness ratio will be estimated. DISCUSSION: If successful, evidence from this trial could improve malaria treatment adherence and offer pragmatic approaches for antimalarial drug resistance surveillance and risk mitigation in Africa. CURRENT CONTROLLED TRIALS: ISRCTN39512726.

Indexed as

AdherenceDay 3 post treatment reviewsEfficacyMalaria treatmentMobile phoneRandomized controlled trialShort message service (SMS)

Identifiers

PMID31285980
PMCPMC6614027
OpenAlexW2597703937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.