Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285955›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2019

Randomized phase II study of pemetrexed-cisplatin or docetaxel-cisplatin plus thoracic intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma.

Sheng-Fa Su, Mei Li, Yi-Chao Geng, Wen-Gang Yang, Zhu Ma, Qing-Song Li, Yin-Xiang Hu, Wei-Wei Ou Yang, Ling-Feng Liu, Bing Lu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sheng-Fa SuDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University Guiyang 550004, China.
Mei LiDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University Guiyang 550004, China.
Yi-Chao GengDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University Guiyang 550004, China.
Wen-Gang YangDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University Guiyang 550004, China.
Zhu MaDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University Guiyang 550004, China.
Qing-Song LiDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University Guiyang 550004, China.
Yin-Xiang HuDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University Guiyang 550004, China.
Wei-Wei Ou YangDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University Guiyang 550004, China.
Ling-Feng LiuDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University Guiyang 550004, China.
Bing LuDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University Guiyang 550004, China.
Guiyang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic chemotherapy is the standard treatment modality for stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR wild-type or unknown mutation status. Recent years, there is increasing evidence showed that selected patients with stage IV disease could benefit from aggressive thoracic radiotherapy. Either pemetrexed or docetaxel, combined with cisplatin, can be used for patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma. However, no prospective trials have confirmed that Pem-Cis was superior to Doc-Cis in lung adenocarcinoma. In this randomized phase 2 trial, we evaluated survival outcomes, and toxicity of Pemetrexed-Cisplatin (arm A) or Docetaxel-Cisplatin (arm B) with concurrent IMRT to the primary tumor for stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR wild-type or unknown mutation status. Totally, 101 patients were randomly assigned (50 in arm A and 51 in arm B). Using an intention-to-treat analysis, one-year survival rates were 72.0% and 52.9%, respectively (P=0.020). Progression-free survival was also significantly improved in the arm A (median, 12.6 v 7.5 months, P=0.013). The incidence and severity of acute pneumonitis and esophagitis was similar between two arms. Although more of grade 3 or 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia in arm A, and higher rates grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, and leukopenia were observed in arm B. Pem-Cis first-line chemotherapy with concurrent radiation therapy for stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR wild-type or unknown mutation status represents a potential treatment option with acceptable toxicity and high overall survival rates.

Indexed as

concurrent chemoradiotherapydocetaxellung adenocarcinomapemetrexedphase II studyStage IV

Identifiers

PMID31285955
PMCPMC6610059
OpenAlexW2980475210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.