Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285926›Full record

ArticleArab journal of urology2019

Dusting versus fragmentation for renal stones during flexible ureteroscopy.

Ahmed R El-Nahas, Shabir Almousawi, Yaqoub Alqattan, Imad M Alqadri, Tariq F Al-Shaiji, Abdullatif Al-Terki

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arab journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07639385 (Fragmentation Vs Dusting Using TFL With FANS for Renal Stones Less Than 2cm), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07639385 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Fragmentation Vs Dusting Using TFL With FANS for Renal Stones Less Than 2cm

TypeinterventionalSponsorBir HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled86ConditionsThulium Fiber Laser, Fans, Lithotripsy, Laser, Renal StoneArmsDusting, Fragmentation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Retrograde intrarenal surgery: Past, present, and future.Investigative and clinical urology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed R El-NahasUrology Unit, Surgery Department, Al-Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Shabir AlmousawiUrology Unit, Surgery Department, Al-Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Yaqoub AlqattanUrology Unit, Surgery Department, Al-Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Imad M AlqadriUrology Unit, Surgery Department, Al-Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Tariq F Al-ShaijiUrology Unit, Surgery Department, Al-Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Abdullatif Al-TerkiUrology Unit, Surgery Department, Al-Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Amiri Hospital · KWMansoura University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

DustingFlexible ureteroscopylaserrenal calculistones

Identifiers

PMID31285926
PMCPMC6600060
OpenAlexW2941199298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.