Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285910›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2019

Domiciliary use of transcutaneous electrical stimulation for patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a conceptual framework for the TESLA home programme.

Baiting He, Miral Al-Sherif, Miriam Nido, Rukiye Tas, Marianne Beach, Esther I Schwarz, Michael Cheng, Athanasius Ishak, Kai Lee, Nimish Shah and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 7 countries.

Baiting HeLane Fox Unit/Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Miral Al-SherifLane Fox Unit/Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Miriam NidoLane Fox Unit/Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rukiye TasFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, UK.
Marianne BeachFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, UK.
Esther I SchwarzLane Fox Unit/Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Michael ChengLane Fox Unit/Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Athanasius IshakLane Fox Unit/Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kai LeeFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, UK.
Nimish ShahJaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
Brian KentLane Fox Unit/Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Paul Eze-JohnLane Fox Unit/Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Culadeeban RatneswaranLane Fox Unit/Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Gerrard RaffertyFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, UK.
Adrian J WilliamsLane Fox Unit/Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nicholas HartLane Fox Unit/Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Yuanming LuoFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, UK.
John MoxhamFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, UK.
Martino PengoLane Fox Unit/Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Joerg SteierLane Fox Unit/Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
King's College London · GBThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a global health problem of increasing prevalence. Effective treatments are available with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and mandibular advancement devices (MAD). However, there is limited long-term adherence to therapy, as CPAP and MAD require permanent usage to avoid recurrence of the symptoms and adverse ill health. Alternative treatments would aid in the treatment cascade to manage OSA effectively whenever standard therapy has been trialled and failed. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS), an invasive approach to stimulate the pharyngeal dilator muscles of the upper airway during sleep, has been approved for the treatment of OSA by several healthcare systems in recent years. In parallel to the development of HNS, a non-invasive approach has been developed to deliver electrical stimulation. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation in obstructive sleep apnoea (TESLA) uses non-invasive electrical stimulation to increase neuromuscular tone of the upper airway dilator muscles of patients with OSA during sleep. Data from previous feasibility studies and randomised controlled trials have helped to identify a subgroup of patients who are "responders" to this treatment. However, further investigations are required to assess usability, functionality and task accomplishment of this novel treatment. Consideration of these factors in the study design of future clinical trials will strengthen research methodology and protocols, improve patient related outcome measures and assessments, to optimise this emerging therapeutical option. In this review, we will introduce a conceptual framework for the TESLA home programme highlighting qualitative aspects and outcomes.

Indexed as

compliancecontinuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS)neural stimulationsleepiness

Identifiers

PMID31285910
PMCPMC6588784
OpenAlexW2947301803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.