Electronic chest tube drainage devices and low suction following video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The impact of hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine in serratus anterior plane block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025
   Trial
2. The impact of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block on the quality of recovery after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2025
   Review
3. Efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic-guided multiple paravertebral block for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy surgery: a randomized blinded controlled study.Frontiers in surgery · 2023
   Article
4. -8 cm HANZ journal of surgery · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The effects of low suction on digital drainage devices after lobectomy using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial†.2019

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.