Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285847›Full record

ReviewNPJ science of learning2019

Is plasticity of synapses the mechanism of long-term memory storage?

Wickliffe C Abraham, Owen D Jones, David L Glanzman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ science of learning, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 374 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How Neuromorphic Microstructures Control In Vitro Early-Stage Neuronal Outgrowth.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Reductionism in Engram Neuroscience.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chronic Pain and Cognitive Dysfunction: Clinical Implement, Mechanism, and Therapeutic Strategy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The how and why for multiple forms of hippocampal LTP.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wickliffe C Abraham1Department of Psychology, Brain Health Research Centre, Brain Research New Zealand, University of Otago, Box 56, Dunedin, 9010 New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9919-0622
Owen D Jones1Department of Psychology, Brain Health Research Centre, Brain Research New Zealand, University of Otago, Box 56, Dunedin, 9010 New Zealand.
David L Glanzman2Departments of Integrative Biology and Physiology, and Neurobiology, and the Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.
Brain Research New Zealand · NZAllen Institute for Brain Science · US

Funding

PLASTICITY AT SENSORIMOTOR SYNAPSES IN CULTURER01NS029563 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GLANZMAN, DAVID L · 1992 to 2017
$2.6M
Mechanisms of Long-Term Memory Maintenance in Aplysia.R01MH096120 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GLANZMAN, DAVID L · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096120NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS029563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been 70 years since Donald Hebb published his formalized theory of synaptic adaptation during learning. Hebb's seminal work foreshadowed some of the great neuroscientific discoveries of the following decades, including the discovery of long-term potentiation and other lasting forms of synaptic plasticity, and more recently the residence of memories in synaptically connected neuronal assemblies. Our understanding of the processes underlying learning and memory has been dominated by the view that synapses are the principal site of information storage in the brain. This view has received substantial support from research in several model systems, with the vast majority of studies on the topic corroborating a role for synapses in memory storage. Yet, despite the neuroscience community's best efforts, we are still without conclusive proof that memories reside at synapses. Furthermore, an increasing number of non-synaptic mechanisms have emerged that are also capable of acting as memory substrates. In this review, we address the key findings from the synaptic plasticity literature that make these phenomena such attractive memory mechanisms. We then turn our attention to evidence that questions the reliance of memory exclusively on changes at the synapse and attempt to integrate these opposing views.

Indexed as

Long-term memoryLong-term potentiation

Identifiers

PMID31285847
PMCPMC6606636
OpenAlexW2954793775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.