Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285789›Full record

ArticleDementia & neuropsychologia

Olfactory impairment in frontotemporal dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maren de Moraes E Silva, Camila Poletto Viveiros, Nikolai José Eustátios Kotsifas, Alexia Duarte, Evelyn Dib, Pilar Bueno Siqueira Mercer, Renata Ramina Pessoa, Maria Carolina Zavagna Witt

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia & neuropsychologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Structural and functional correlates of olfactory reward processing in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maren de Moraes E SilvaNeurology Department, Hospital da Cruz Vermelha Brasileira Filial Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Camila Poletto ViveirosFaculdade Evangélica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Nikolai José Eustátios KotsifasUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Alexia DuarteUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Evelyn DibFaculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Pilar Bueno Siqueira MercerNeurology Department, Hospital da Cruz Vermelha Brasileira Filial Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Renata Ramina PessoaNeurology Department, Hospital da Cruz Vermelha Brasileira Filial Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Maria Carolina Zavagna WittNeurology Department, Hospital da Cruz Vermelha Brasileira Filial Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRFaculdade Evangélica do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) presents clinically in three variants: one behavioral and two with progressive primary aphasia - non-fluent/agrammatic and semantic. Defined by the degenerative process and cerebral atrophy, olfactory dysfunction occurs in up to 96% of previous FTD case series.

objectivethe present study aims to critically synthesize data about the relationship between FTD and olfactory impairment to analyze the usefulness of olfactory evaluation tests as a complementary element in early diagnosis.

methodsa database search was performed using the keywords "olfactory OR smell OR olfaction AND frontotemporal dementia". We included studies that evaluated olfactory function in patients diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia, all subtypes, compared with age-matched healthy controls. For comparative purposes, the effect size was calculated using Cohen's D. The studies selected were categorized according to dementia variant and olfactory test type. A meta-analysis was performed using forest plots - homogeneity was evaluated by statistical tests (i

resultsten articles met the inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity was classified as low for semantic dementia olfactory identification and behavioral variant olfactory discrimination groups (i

conclusionpatients with the frontotemporal dementia behavioral variant seem to present with alterations in odor identification, but with preserved discrimination. Scent identification also seems to be impaired in semantic dementia. Therefore, we conclude that olfactory evaluation in these patients is possibly impacted by cognitive alterations and not by sensory deficits. Application of olfactory tests may prove important in differentiating prodromal states from other types of dementia with more pronounced olfactory impairment.

Indexed as

cognitionfrontotemporal dementiafrontotemporal lobar degeneration.olfaction disorders

Identifiers

PMID31285789
PMCPMC6601313
OpenAlexW2955561621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.