Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285733›Full record

ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2019

ARDS among cutaneous burn patients combined with inhalation injury: early onset and bad outcome.

N N Lam, T D Hung

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Synopsis of Clinical Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS).Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N N LamNational Burns Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
T D HungNational Burns Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
National Hospital of Pediatrics · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aims are to determine the clinical and preclinical characteristics and outcome of ARDS among burn patients with inhalation injury. A retrospective study was conducted on 66 selected patients with ARDS, treated in the ICU of the National Burns Hospital from 11/2013 to 10/2016. The patients were divided into two groups and matched by age and burn extent: the study group consisted of 33 patients with inhalation injury and the control group 33 patients without inhalation injury. Outcome measures included blood gas criteria and oxygenation state at ARDS onset, mechanical ventilation duration, length of stay in the ICU and in the hospital, ventilation-free time and mortality rate until 28 days postburn. Results showed that ARDS onset was earlier in the study group (5.9 ±.7 vs. 9.2 ± .9 days postburn respectively; p < 0.01) and blood oxygenation disorder was more severe (PaO2/FiO2: 117.8 ± 6.1 vs. 125.9 ± 6.5 respectively; p < .01). There was no significant difference between the two groups (p > .05) regarding incidence of complications, ventilation time, ventilation-free duration, and length of stay in the ICU and in the hospital. Mortality rate until 28 days post burn was significantly higher among the study group (69.7% vs. 54.6% respectively; p < .001). In addition, time from admission and from ARDS onset to death was shorter in the study group (P < .05). In conclusion, compared to cutaneous burn-induced ARDS, ARDS in patients with inhalation injury has earlier onset, causes more severe oxygenation disorder and has a higher mortality rate.

Indexed as

acute respiratory distress syndromecutaneous burninhalation injury

Identifiers

PMID31285733
PMCPMC6588331
OpenAlexW2987883094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.