Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285706›Full record

ArticleCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada2019

Summary of the NACI Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Statement for 2019-2020.

L Zhao, K Young, I Gemmill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Influenza vaccine: a review on current scenario and future prospects.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The use and impact of monoclonal antibody biologics during pregnancy.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Promoting immunization resiliency in the digital information age.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2020
    Article
  15. Should individuals use influenza vaccine effectiveness studies to inform their decision to get vaccinated?Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L ZhaoCentre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
K YoungCentre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
I GemmillNACI Influenza Working Group Chair.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany different influenza vaccines are authorized for use in Canada and new evidence on influenza and vaccines is continually emerging. The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) provides annual recommendations regarding the use of seasonal influenza vaccines to the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) for the upcoming influenza season.

objectiveTo summarize NACI recommendations regarding the use of seasonal influenza vaccines for the 2019-2020 influenza season, including conclusions from reviews of evidence on 1) a new split virus quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine and 2) the comparative effectiveness and immunogenicity of subunit and split virus inactivated influenza vaccines in adults 65 years of age and older.

methodsFor both topics, the NACI Influenza Working Group developed a predefined search strategy to identify all eligible studies, assessed their quality, summarized and analyzed the findings and, according to the NACI evidence-based process, proposed recommendations and identified the grade of evidence that supported them. In light of the evidence, the recommendations were then considered and approved by NACI.

resultsNACI concluded that the new split virus quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine has a safety and immunogenicity profile comparable to the quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccines already authorized for adults and children 5 years of age and older (Grade B Evidence). Therefore, NACI recommended that this new vaccine may be considered among the quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccines offered to adults and children five years of age and older (Discretionary NACI Recommendation). However, NACI concluded that the evidence is not sufficient (Grade I Evidence) to support specific recommendations on the differential use of subunit and split virus inactivated influenza vaccines in adults 65 years of age and older.

conclusionNACI continues to recommend that an age-appropriate influenza vaccine should be offered annually to anyone six months of age and older who does not have contraindications to the vaccine, with focus on the groups for whom influenza vaccination is particularly recommended. This includes people at high risk of influenza-related complications or hospitalization, people capable of transmitting influenza to those at high risk, people who provide essential community services and people in direct contact with poultry infected with avian influenza during culling operations.

Indexed as

guidanceinfluenzainfluenza vaccineNACINational Advisory Committee on Immunization

Identifiers

PMID31285706
PMCPMC6587699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.