Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285687›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2019

Gaps and delays in survivorship care in the return-to-work pathway for survivors of breast cancer-a qualitative study.

K Bilodeau, D Tremblay, M J Durand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Psychosocial experiences of breast cancer survivors: a meta-review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Experiences of women with breast cancer while working or returning to work: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Beyond breast cancer: mapping unmet needs and advancing an evidence-based framework of survivorship care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A multidisciplinary working model for promoting return to work of cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2021
    Article
  16. The post-treatment return-to-work transition experience for breast cancer survivors under 50 years of age.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2021
    Article
  17. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020
    Article
  18. Facing forward: The development of a cancer nursing knowledge and practice framework.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K BilodeauFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC.
D TremblayFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC.
M J DurandFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The number of survivors of breast cancer (bca) in Canada has steadily increased thanks to major advances in cancer care. But the resulting clientele face new challenges related to survivorship. The lack of continuity of care and the side effects of treatment affect the resumption of active life by survivors of bca, including return to work (rtw). The goal of the present article was to outline gaps and delay in survivorship care in the rtw pathway of survivors of bca. Methods: This qualitative interpretative descriptive study recruited 9 survivors of bca in the province of Quebec. Interviews were conducted at the end of cancer treatments ( Results: The interviews highlighted gaps in survivorship care and the paucity of dedicated resources for cancer survivors. Participants received neither a survivorship care plan nor information about cancer survivorship (for example, transition to a new normal, side effects, rtw). Conclusions: Support for survivors of bca resuming their active lives has to be optimized. We suggest that health professionals have to intervene at 1, 3, and 6 months after cancer treatment. At those points, survivors of bca need support for side-effects management, the rtw decision, resource navigation, and reintegration of daily activities. Also, delay in clinical pathways seems to be longer, and much attention is needed to accompany the transition to a "normal life" after cancer.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsContinuity of Patient CareSurvivorshipBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQualitative Researchhealth care servicesreturn to workSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID31285687
PMCPMC6588070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.