Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285666›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2019

An integrated knowledge translation approach to develop a shared decision-making strategy for use by Inuit in cancer care: a qualitative study.

J Jull, A Hizaka, A J Sheppard, A Kewayosh, P Doering, L MacLeod, G Joudain, J Plourde, D Dorschner, Inuit Medical Interpreter Team and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interventions for Indigenous Peoples making health decisions: a systematic review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

J JullSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
A HizakaTungasuvvingat Inuit, Ottawa, ON.
A J SheppardIndigenous Cancer Control Unit, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON.
A KewayoshIndigenous Cancer Control Unit, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON.
P DoeringThe Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON.
L MacLeodLarga Baffin, Ottawa, ON.
G JoudainOttawa Health Services Network Inc., Ottawa, ON.
J PlourdeOttawa Health Services Network Inc., Ottawa, ON.
D DorschnerOttawa Health Services Network Inc., Ottawa, ON.
Inuit Medical Interpreter Team
M RandIndigenous Cancer Control Unit, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON.
M HabashIndigenous Cancer Control Unit, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON.
I D GrahamEpidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.

Funding

CIHR FDN 143247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In relation to the general Canadian population, Inuit face increased cancer risks and barriers to health services use. In shared decision-making (sdm), health care providers and patients make health care decisions together. Enhanced participation in cancer care decisions is a need for Inuit. Integrated knowledge translation (kt) supports the development of research evidence that is likely to be patient-centred and applied in practice. Objective: Using an integrated kt approach, we set out to promote the use of sdm by Inuit in cancer care. Methods: An integrated kt study involving researchers with a Steering Committee of cancer care system partners who support Inuit in cancer care ("the team") consisted of 2 theory-driven phases:■ using consensus-building methods to tailor a previously developed sdm strategy and developing training in the sdm strategy; and■ training community support workers (csws) in the sdm strategy and testing the sdm strategy with community members. Results: The team developed a sdm strategy that included a workshop and a booklet with 6 questions for use by csws with patients. The sdm strategy (training and booklet) was finalized based on feedback from 5 urban-based Inuit csws who were recruited and trained in using the strategy. Trained csws were matched with 8 community members, and use of the sdm strategy was assessed during interviews, reported as 6 themes. Participants found the sdm strategy to be useful and feasible for use. Conclusions: An integrated kt approach of structured research processes with partners developed a sdm strategy for use by Inuit in cancer care. Further work is needed to test the sdm strategy.

Indexed as

Decision MakingInuitAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsQualitative ResearchTranslational Research, BiomedicalYoung Adultco-creationdecision coachingfield testsintegrated knowledge translationInuitshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID31285666
PMCPMC6588049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.