Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285662›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2019

Research priorities for the pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support practice guides: a modified nominal group consensus.

L A Jibb, D Stacey, M Carley, A Davis, I D Graham, E Green, L Jolicoeur, C Kuziemsky, C Ludwig, T Truant

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Defining research priorities and needs in cancer symptoms for adults diagnosed with cancer: an Australian/New Zealand modified Delphi study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Delivery of cancer care via an outpatient telephone support line: a cross-sectional study of oncology nursing perspectives on quality and challenges.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Quality of telephone-based cancer symptom management by nurses: a quality improvement project.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  8. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020
    Article
  9. Pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) practice guides - What's changed in Version 2020?Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

L A JibbFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
D StaceyFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
M CarleyClinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON.
A DavisWashington State University College of Nursing, Vancouver, WA, U.S.A.
I D GrahamFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
E GreenThe Ottawa Hospital, Cancer Program, Ottawa, ON.
L JolicoeurThe Ottawa Hospital, Cancer Program, Ottawa, ON.
C KuziemskyTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
C LudwigPatient advisor.
T TruantBC Cancer, Education and Innovation, Vancouver, BC.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (costars) team is studying how to improve the quality and consistency of cancer symptom management. Methods: A 1-day invitational meeting was held 24 October 2017 in Ottawa, Ontario, to review the current evidence from costars projects and to establish research priorities for a future largescale implementation study. The meeting included 36 participants who were clinicians from adult oncology, pediatric oncology, and homecare; policymakers from national, provincial, and regional organizations; researchers; and a patient. Half the day involved summarizing evidence from four costars studies and experiences with implementing the costars symptom practice guides. The second half of the day used a modified nominal group technique to generate research questions within small groups, presentation of research questions to all participants, and two rounds of voting to reach consensus on research priorities. Results: Participants proposed 4 research categories:■ User-centred augmentation to enhance usability (for example, designing a mobile costars solution)■ Outcome measurement (for example, determining key competencies for clinicians)■ Regular renewal of costars to keep pace with evolving evidence (for example, updates for novel therapies)■ Integration into clinical practice (for example, meaningful engagement of patients and caregivers in study design). Conclusions: Across categories, the top 3 priorities were effect on health services use, competency development, and a mobile costars solution. Future research will address identified priorities, reflecting the needs and perspectives of diverse stakeholders. Stakeholder collaboration will continue to guide our approach to operationalizing this priority research agenda.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyBiomedical ResearchCanadaHumansNeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicSymptom AssessmentTriageconsensus meetingsnurse triageresearch prioritiesSupportive caresymptom management

Identifiers

PMID31285662
PMCPMC6588050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.