ArticleBioinformation2019
PocketPipe: A computational pipeline for integratedPocketome prediction and comparison.
Article in Bioinformation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional characterisation of proteins often depends on specific interactions with other molecules. In the drug discovery scenario, the ability of a protein to bind with drug-like molecule with a high affinity is referred as druggability. Deciphering such druggable binding pockets on proteins plays an important role in structure-based drug designing studies. Moreover, availability of plethora of structural data poses a need automated pipelines which can efficiently integrate robust algorithms towards large-scale pocket identification and comparison. These pipelines have direct applicability on off-target analysis, drug repurposing and structural prioritization of drug targets in pathogenic microbes. However, currently there is a paucity of such efficient pipelines. Hence, by this study a highly optimized shell script based pipeline (PocketPipe) has been developed with seamless integration of robust algorithms namely, P2Rank (predicts binding sites based on machine learning) and PocketMatch-v2.1 (compares binding pockets by residue-based method), for pocketome generation and comparison, respectively. The process of input workflow and various steps carried out by PocketPipe and the output results are well documented in the operating manual. On execution, the pipeline features seamless operability, high scalability, dynamic file handling and results parsing. PocketPipe is distributed freely under GNU GPL license and can be downloaded at https://github.com/inpacdb/PocketPipe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.