Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285574›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2019

Vertical transmission of sponge microbiota is inconsistent and unfaithful.

Johannes R Björk, Cristina Díez-Vives, Carmen Astudillo-García, Elizabeth A Archie, José M Montoya

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johannes R BjörkDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA. rbjork@nd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9768-1946
Cristina Díez-VivesNatural History Museum, London, UK.
Carmen Astudillo-GarcíaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Elizabeth A ArchieDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA. earchie@nd.edu.
José M MontoyaTheoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS-University Paul Sabatier, Moulis, France. josemaria.montoyateran@sete.cnrs.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6676-7592

Funding

European Research Council 726176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-evolutionary theory predicts that if beneficial microbial symbionts improve host fitness, they should be faithfully transmitted to offspring. More recently, the hologenome theory of evolution predicts resemblance between parent and offspring microbiomes and high partner fidelity between host species and their vertically transmitted microbes. Here, we test these ideas in multiple coexisting host species with highly diverse microbiota, leveraging known parent-offspring pairs sampled from eight species of wild marine sponges (Porifera). We found that the processes governing vertical transmission were both neutral and selective. A neutral model was a better fit to larval (R

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPoriferaAnimalsBacteriaBiodiversityPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID31285574
PMCPMC6914380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.