Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285526›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Static magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex impairs online but not offline motor sequence learning.

Angélina Lacroix, Léa Proulx-Bégin, Raphaël Hamel, Louis De Beaumont, Pierre-Michel Bernier, Jean-François Lepage

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Static magnetic stimulation in the central nervous system: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angélina LacroixDepartment of Pediatrics, Sherbrooke University, 3001-12th Ave. North, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Léa Proulx-BéginDepartment of Psychology, Montreal University, 90 Ave. Vincent d'Indy, Montréal, Canada.
Raphaël HamelDepartment of Pediatrics, Sherbrooke University, 3001-12th Ave. North, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Louis De BeaumontDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Pavillon Roger-Gaudry C.P, 6128, Montréal, Canada.
Pierre-Michel BernierFaculty of Physical Activity Sciences, Sherbrooke University, 2500 de l'Université Blvd., Sherbrooke, Canada.
Jean-François LepageDepartment of Pediatrics, Sherbrooke University, 3001-12th Ave. North, Sherbrooke, Canada. jean-francois.lepage@usherbrooke.ca.
Université de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Static magnetic fields (SMFs) are known to alter neural activity, but evidence of their ability to modify learning-related neuroplasticity is lacking. The present study tested the hypothesis that application of static magnetic stimulation (SMS), an SMF applied transcranially via a neodymium magnet, over the primary motor cortex (M1) would alter learning of a serial reaction time task (SRTT). Thirty-nine participants took part in two experimental sessions separated by 24 h where they had to learn the SRTT with their right hand. During the first session, two groups received SMS either over contralateral (i.e., left) or ipsilateral (i.e., right) M1 while a third group received sham stimulation. SMS was not applied during the second session. Results of the first session showed that application of SMS over contralateral M1 impaired online learning as compared to both ipsilateral and sham groups, which did not differ. Results further revealed that application of SMS did not impair offline learning or relearning. Overall, these results are in line with those obtained using other neuromodulatory techniques believed to reduce cortical excitability in the context of motor learning and suggest that the ability of SMS to alter learning-related neuroplasticity is temporally circumscribed to the duration of its application.

Indexed as

AdultCognitionEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHandHumansLearningMagnetic PhenomenaMaleMotor CortexMotor SkillsPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31285526
PMCPMC6614538
OpenAlexW2956130785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.