Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285343›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

White matter volume and white/gray matter ratio in mammalian species as a consequence of the universal scaling of cortical folding.

Bruno Mota, Sandra E Dos Santos, Lissa Ventura-Antunes, Débora Jardim-Messeder, Kleber Neves, Rodrigo S Kazu, Stephen Noctor, Kelly Lambert, Mads F Bertelsen, Paul R Manger and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Deformation-based morphometry: a sensitive imaging approach to detect radiation-induced brain injury?Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Predictability of cortico-cortical connections in the mammalian brain.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bruno MotaInstituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-909, Brazil.
Sandra E Dos SantosDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.
Lissa Ventura-AntunesDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.
Débora Jardim-MessederInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-901, Brazil.
Kleber NevesInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-901, Brazil.
Rodrigo S KazuInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-901, Brazil.
Stephen NoctorDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Kelly LambertDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173.
Mads F BertelsenCenter for Zoo and Wild Animal Health, Copenhagen Zoo, 2000 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Paul R MangerSchool of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein 2000, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Chet C SherwoodDepartment of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052.
Jon H KaasDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203; jon.h.kaas@vanderbilt.edu suzana.herculano@vanderbilt.edu.
Suzana Herculano-HouzelDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203; jon.h.kaas@vanderbilt.edu suzana.herculano@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because the white matter of the cerebral cortex contains axons that connect distant neurons in the cortical gray matter, the relationship between the volumes of the 2 cortical compartments is key for information transmission in the brain. It has been suggested that the volume of the white matter scales universally as a function of the volume of the gray matter across mammalian species, as would be expected if a global principle of wiring minimization applied. Using a systematic analysis across several mammalian clades, here we show that the volume of the white matter does not scale universally with the volume of the gray matter across mammals and is not optimized for wiring minimization. Instead, the ratio between volumes of gray and white matter is universally predicted by the same equation that predicts the degree of folding of the cerebral cortex, given the clade-specific scaling of cortical thickness, such that the volume of the gray matter (or the ratio of gray to total cortical volumes) divided by the square root of cortical thickness is a universal function of total cortical volume, regardless of the number of cortical neurons. Thus, the very mechanism that we propose to generate cortical folding also results in compactness of the white matter to a predictable degree across a wide variety of mammalian species.

Indexed as

AnimalsArtiodactylaCerebral CortexConnectomeGray MatterHumansNeuronsOrgan SizeOrgan SpecificityPrimatesRodentiaScandentiaWhite Matterbrain sizecortical foldingevolutionscalingwhite matter

Identifiers

PMID31285343
PMCPMC6660724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.