Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31285182›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. HIV2019

Development and validation of an automated HIV prediction algorithm to identify candidates for pre-exposure prophylaxis: a modelling study.

Douglas S Krakower, Susan Gruber, Katherine Hsu, John T Menchaca, Judith C Maro, Benjamin A Kruskal, Ira B Wilson, Kenneth H Mayer, Michael Klompas

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. HIV, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Machine learning for personalized risk assessment of HIV, syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Identify Patients at Risk of HIV Using a Clinical Large Language Model from Electronic Health Records.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Douglas S KrakowerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: dkrakowe@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Susan GruberDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine HsuBureau of Infectious Disease and Laboratory Sciences, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
John T MenchacaDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Judith C MaroDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Benjamin A KruskalAtrius Health, Boston, MA, USA; New England Quality Care Alliance, Braintree, MA, USA.
Ira B WilsonDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Kenneth H MayerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael KlompasDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

The impact of HIV viral diversity and cellular immunity on HIV pathogenesisP30AI060354 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI ROBERT A. PARKER · 2004 to 2026
$94.4M
Translational ScienceP30AI042853 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI LARRY K BROWN · 1998 to 2026
$51.7M
Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115677 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ROUNDS, SHARON IRENE SMITH · 2016 to 2025
$45.0M
Optimizing HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis through Shared Decision MakingK23MH098795 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI KRAKOWER, DOUGLAS SCOTT · 2012 to 2016
$873k
NCHHSTP CDC HHS H25 PS004253NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI042853NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI060354NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115677NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH098795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective but underused, in part because clinicians do not have the tools to identify PrEP candidates. We developed and validated an automated prediction algorithm that uses electronic health record (EHR) data to identify individuals at increased risk for HIV acquisition.

methodsWe used machine learning algorithms to predict incident HIV infections with 180 potential predictors of HIV risk drawn from EHR data from 2007-15 at Atrius Health, an ambulatory group practice in Massachusetts, USA. We included EHRs of all patients aged 15 years or older with at least one clinical encounter during 2007-15. We used ten-fold cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (cv-AUC) with 95% CIs to assess the model's performance at identifying individuals with incident HIV and patients independently prescribed PrEP by clinicians. The best-performing model was validated prospectively with 2016 data from Atrius Health and externally with 2011-16 data from Fenway Health, a community health centre specialising in sexual health care in Boston (MA, USA). We calculated HIV risk scores (ie, probability of an incident HIV diagnosis) for every HIV-uninfected patient not on PrEP during 2007-15 at Atrius Health and assessed the distribution of scores for thresholds to determine possible candidates for PrEP in the three study cohorts.

findingsWe included 1 155 966 Atrius Health patients from 2007-15 (150 [<0·1%] patients with incident HIV) in our development cohort, 537 257 Atrius Health patients in 2016 (16 [<0·1%] with incident HIV) in our prospective validation cohort, and 33 404 Fenway Health patients from 2011-16 (423 [1·3%] with incident HIV) in our external validation cohort. The best-performing algorithm was obtained with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and had a cv-AUC of 0·86 (95% CI 0·82-0·90) for identification of incident HIV infections in the development cohort, 0·91 (0·81-1·00) on prospective validation, and 0·77 (0·74-0·79) on external validation. The LASSO model successfully identified patients independently prescribed PrEP by clinicians at Atrius Health in 2016 (cv-AUC 0·93, 95% CI 0·90-0·96) or Fenway Health (0·79, 0·78-0·80). HIV risk scores increased steeply at the 98th percentile. Using this score as a threshold, we prospectively identified 9515 (1·8%) of 536 384 patients at Atrius Health in 2016 and 4385 (15·3%) of 28 702 Fenway Health patients as potential PrEP candidates.

interpretationAutomated algorithms can efficiently identify patients at increased risk for HIV acquisition. Integrating these models into EHRs to alert providers about patients who might benefit from PrEP could improve prescribing and prevent new HIV infections.

fundingHarvard University Center for AIDS Research, Providence/Boston Center for AIDS Research, Rhode Island IDeA-CTR, the National Institute of Mental Health, and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPre-Exposure ProphylaxisProspective StudiesYoung AdultAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID31285182
PMCPMC7522919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.