ArticleThe lancet. HIV2019
Development and validation of an automated HIV prediction algorithm to identify candidates for pre-exposure prophylaxis: a modelling study.
Article in The lancet. HIV, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
75 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning for personalized risk assessment of HIV, syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Performance of HIV Infection Prediction Models in Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Archives of sexual behavior · 2023Pooled it
- Risk-Based Screening Tools to Optimise HIV Testing Services: a Systematic Review.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2022Pooled it
- Acute and early HIV infection screening among men who have sex with men, a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2020Pooled it
- Identify Patients at Risk of HIV Using a Clinical Large Language Model from Electronic Health Records.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in HIV research: a structured review and task-oriented clinical framework.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Article
- HIV Prevention Continuum Outcomes Following Implementation of a Municipal HIV Self-Testing Program.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Identify Patients at Risk of HIV Using a Clinical Large Language Model from Electronic Health Records.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in medicine: Current applications in cardiology, oncology, and radiology.World journal of methodology · 2025Review
- Prediction of new HIV infection in men who have sex with men based on machine learning: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study from Western China.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- External validation of a web- and artificial intelligence-based HIV/STI risk assessment tool: performance evaluation using data from Sydney sexual health centre.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Identifying Substance Use and High-Risk Sexual Behavior Among Sexual and Gender Minority Youth by Using Mobile Phone Data: Development and Validation Study.Online journal of public health informatics · 2025Article
- HIV Risk Score and Prediction Model in the United States: A Scoping Review.AIDS and behavior · 2025Article
- Frequent Missed Opportunities for Earlier HIV Diagnosis in a Routine Opt-out Testing Environment in Atlanta.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Predictive Models to Identify Individuals With HIV at Risk of Unsuppressed Viral Load Using Routine Public Health Data.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2025Article
- Development of an electronic health record-based Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) risk prediction model for women, incorporating social determinants of health.BMC public health · 2025Article
- HEalth Record Optimization for Identifying Candidates for HIV PRe-Exposure Prophylaxis: A Community-Informed Approach to Model Development.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2025Article
- Association of an HIV-Prediction Model with Uptake of Preexposure Prophylaxis.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- A Multicomponent Strategy to Improve HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in a Southern US Jail: Protocol for a Type 3 Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective but underused, in part because clinicians do not have the tools to identify PrEP candidates. We developed and validated an automated prediction algorithm that uses electronic health record (EHR) data to identify individuals at increased risk for HIV acquisition.
methodsWe used machine learning algorithms to predict incident HIV infections with 180 potential predictors of HIV risk drawn from EHR data from 2007-15 at Atrius Health, an ambulatory group practice in Massachusetts, USA. We included EHRs of all patients aged 15 years or older with at least one clinical encounter during 2007-15. We used ten-fold cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (cv-AUC) with 95% CIs to assess the model's performance at identifying individuals with incident HIV and patients independently prescribed PrEP by clinicians. The best-performing model was validated prospectively with 2016 data from Atrius Health and externally with 2011-16 data from Fenway Health, a community health centre specialising in sexual health care in Boston (MA, USA). We calculated HIV risk scores (ie, probability of an incident HIV diagnosis) for every HIV-uninfected patient not on PrEP during 2007-15 at Atrius Health and assessed the distribution of scores for thresholds to determine possible candidates for PrEP in the three study cohorts.
findingsWe included 1 155 966 Atrius Health patients from 2007-15 (150 [<0·1%] patients with incident HIV) in our development cohort, 537 257 Atrius Health patients in 2016 (16 [<0·1%] with incident HIV) in our prospective validation cohort, and 33 404 Fenway Health patients from 2011-16 (423 [1·3%] with incident HIV) in our external validation cohort. The best-performing algorithm was obtained with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and had a cv-AUC of 0·86 (95% CI 0·82-0·90) for identification of incident HIV infections in the development cohort, 0·91 (0·81-1·00) on prospective validation, and 0·77 (0·74-0·79) on external validation. The LASSO model successfully identified patients independently prescribed PrEP by clinicians at Atrius Health in 2016 (cv-AUC 0·93, 95% CI 0·90-0·96) or Fenway Health (0·79, 0·78-0·80). HIV risk scores increased steeply at the 98th percentile. Using this score as a threshold, we prospectively identified 9515 (1·8%) of 536 384 patients at Atrius Health in 2016 and 4385 (15·3%) of 28 702 Fenway Health patients as potential PrEP candidates.
interpretationAutomated algorithms can efficiently identify patients at increased risk for HIV acquisition. Integrating these models into EHRs to alert providers about patients who might benefit from PrEP could improve prescribing and prevent new HIV infections.
fundingHarvard University Center for AIDS Research, Providence/Boston Center for AIDS Research, Rhode Island IDeA-CTR, the National Institute of Mental Health, and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.