ReviewEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2019
Reducing coercion in mental healthcare.
Review in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The use and impact of surveillance-based technology initiatives in inpatient and acute mental health settings: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Risk assessment for aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Measurement Properties of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical and social factors associated with involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation in children and adolescents: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and narrative synthesis.The Lancet. Child & adolescent health · 2021Pooled it
- Validation of a self-harm prediction model in Black youth seeking outpatient mental health care.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Free the Crazy Horse: Franco Basaglia's Revolution in Mental Health and in Society Franco Basaglia and the Treatment of People With Mental Disorders.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Intentions to Care, Structures That Restrain: The Reality of Secure Units in Residential Social Care Institutions in Slovenia.Health and human rights · 2026Article
- Psychiatric and somatic morbidity patterns among patients diagnosed with anorexia nervosa and the risk of involuntary treatment: register-based cohort study.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2026Article
- "Something is clashing" - intentions to offer Medication-Free services within a traditional mental health ward.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- A qualitative study of the impact of the World Health Organisation QualityRights human rights and mental health Training on changing attitudes to mental health and human rights in Ghana.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Mental health laws in Africa: Perspectives from Cabo Verde, Egypt, Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Reflections on Institutional Corruption in Mental Health Policy Implementation: Global Insights and the Eastern European Experience.Health and human rights · 2025Article
- Formal Coercion and the Moral Division of Labor: Moving Beyond Role Conflicts in Psychiatric Nursing.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2025Article
- The Impact of Coercive Measures on the Therapeutic Relationship Between Patients and Nurses in the Acute Psychiatric Care. An Integrative Review.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2025Review
- Nurses' Experiences of Using Coercion in Forensic and Non-Forensic Settings: A Constant Comparative Analysis.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2025Article
- Victorian Mental Health Nurses' Experiences of Mental Health Reform: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
- 5E Mental Health? Notes on an emerging style of thought.Transcultural psychiatry · 2025Article
- When Psychiatric Services Become a Waiting Room: Situational Analysis of Involuntary Commitment and Treatment as Experienced by Patients and Nurses.Clinical nursing research · 2025Article
- Users' Experience of Treatment and Coercion in an Inpatient Medium-Stay Psychiatric Rehabilitation Unit: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2025Article
- Professional experiences on use of the mental health act in ethnically diverse populations: a photovoice study.BMJ mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo examine the extent and nature of coercive practices in mental healthcare and to consider the ethical, human rights challenges facing the current clinical practices in this area. We consider the epidemiology of coercion in mental health and appraise the efficacy of attempts to reduce coercion and make specific recommendations for making mental healthcare less coercive and more consensual.
methodsWe identified references through searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL Plus. Search was limited to articles published from January 1980 to May 2018. Searches were carried out using the terms mental health (admission or detain* or detention or coercion) and treatment (forcible or involuntary or seclusion or restraint). Articles published during this period were further identified through searches in the authors' personal files and Google Scholar. Articles resulting from searches and relevant references cited in those articles were reviewed. Articles and reviews of non-psychiatric population, children under 16 years, and those pertaining exclusively to people with dementia were excluded.
resultsCoercion in its various guises is embedded in mental healthcare. There is very little research in this area and the absence of systematic and routinely collected data is a major barrier to research as well as understanding the nature of coercion and attempts to address this problem. Examples of good practice in this area are limited and there is hardly any evidence pertaining to the generalisability or sustainability of individual programmes. Based on the review, we make specific recommendations to reduce coercive care. Our contention is that this will require more than legislative tinkering and will necessitate a fundamental change in the culture of psychiatry. In particular, we must ensure that clinical practice never compromises people's human rights. It is ethically, clinically and legally necessary to address the problem of coercion and make mental healthcare more consensual.
conclusionAll forms of coercive practices are inconsistent with human rights-based mental healthcare. This is global challenge that requires urgent action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.