Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31284680›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2019

Impact of Gas Flow and Humidity on Trans-Nasal Aerosol Deposition via Nasal Cannula in Adults: A Randomized Cross-Over Study.

Luciana Alcoforado, Arzu Ari, Jacqueline de Melo Barcelar, Simone Cristina S Brandão, James B Fink, Armele Dornelas de Andrade

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02519465 (Evaluation of Lung Deposition of Aerosol Via HFNC in Healthy Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02519465 naunknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of Lung Deposition of Aerosol Via HFNC in Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRan2015 to 2015Enrolled25ConditionsHealthyArms10l/min, 30l/min, 50l/min
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Short-acting βInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. How to deliver aerosolized medications through high flow nasal cannula safely and effectively in the era of COVID-19 and beyond: A narrative review.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luciana AlcoforadoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50740-560, PE, Brazil.
Arzu AriDepartment of Respiratory Therapy, Texas State University, Round Rock, TX 78665, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3126-8144
Jacqueline de Melo BarcelarDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50740-560, PE, Brazil.
Simone Cristina S BrandãoMedicine Nuclear Department, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, PE, Brazil.
James B FinkDepartment of Respiratory Therapy, Texas State University, Round Rock, TX 78665, USA.
Armele Dornelas de AndradeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50740-560, PE, Brazil. armele@ufpe.br.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRTexas State University · US

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico PVE400801/13-2 and PDJ 150454/2018-0Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco APQ0154-4.08/15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrans-nasal pulmonary aerosol delivery using high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) devices is described with the administration of high gas flows exceeding patient inspiratory flow (HF) and with lower flows (LF). The aim of this pilot clinical trial was to compare deposition and distribution of radiolabeled aerosol via nasal cannula in healthy adults across three rates of gas flow delivered with active heated humidification, and to further identify the impact of aerosol administration without heated humidity.

methodsTwenty-three (23) healthy adults (16F) were randomized to receive aerosol with active heated humidification or unheated oxygen at gas flows of 10 L/min (

resultsLung deposition (mean ± SD) with heated humidified gas was greater at 10 L/min than 30 L/min or 50 L/min (17.2 ± 6.8%, 5.71 ± 2.04%, and 3.46 ± 1.24%, respectively;

conclusionsBoth flow and active heated humidity inversely impact aerosol delivery through HFNC. Nevertheless, aerosol administration across the range of commonly used flows can provide measurable levels of lung deposition in healthy adult subjects (NCT02519465).

Indexed as

aerosolhumiditynasal cannulaoxygen and nebulizerscintigraphy

Identifiers

PMID31284680
PMCPMC6680424
OpenAlexW2953647518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.