ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Deep Ensemble Learning Based Objective Grading of Macular Edema by Extracting Clinically Significant Findings from Fused Retinal Imaging Modalities.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive Survey of OCT-Based Disorders Diagnosis: From Feature Extraction Methods to Robust Security Frameworks.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in chorioretinal pathology through fundoscopy: a comprehensive review.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence applications in ophthalmic optical coherence tomography: a 12-year bibliometric analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Deep ensemble learning for automated non-advanced AMD classification using optimized retinal layer segmentation and SD-OCT scans.Computers in biology and medicine · 2023Article
- Continual Learning Objective for Analyzing Complex Knowledge Representations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Development and Clinical Application of Innovative Optical Ophthalmic Imaging Techniques.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Accelerating ophthalmic artificial intelligence research: the role of an open access data repository.Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2020Review
- Automatic Identification and Intuitive Map Representation of the Epiretinal Membrane Presence in 3D OCT Volumes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Automatic Identification and Representation of the Cornea-Contact Lens Relationship Using AS-OCT Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Artificial intelligence: the unstoppable revolution in ophthalmology.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Macular edema (ME) is a retinal condition in which central vision of a patient is affected. ME leads to accumulation of fluid in the surrounding macular region resulting in a swollen macula. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the fundus photography are the two widely used retinal examination techniques that can effectively detect ME. Many researchers have utilized retinal fundus and OCT imaging for detecting ME. However, to the best of our knowledge, no work is found in the literature that fuses the findings from both retinal imaging modalities for the effective and more reliable diagnosis of ME. In this paper, we proposed an automated framework for the classification of ME and healthy eyes using retinal fundus and OCT scans. The proposed framework is based on deep ensemble learning where the input fundus and OCT scans are recognized through the deep convolutional neural network (CNN) and are processed accordingly. The processed scans are further passed to the second layer of the deep CNN model, which extracts the required feature descriptors from both images. The extracted descriptors are then concatenated together and are passed to the supervised hybrid classifier made through the ensemble of the artificial neural networks, support vector machines and naïve Bayes. The proposed framework has been trained on 73,791 retinal scans and is validated on 5100 scans of publicly available Zhang dataset and Rabbani dataset. The proposed framework achieved the accuracy of 94.33% for diagnosing ME and healthy subjects and achieved the mean dice coefficient of 0.9019 ± 0.04 for accurately extracting the retinal fluids, 0.7069 ± 0.11 for accurately extracting hard exudates and 0.8203 ± 0.03 for accurately extracting retinal blood vessels against the clinical markings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.