Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31284334›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2020

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A 7-Letter Coding System That Supports Decision-Making for the Surgical Approach.

Luca Papavero, Gregor Schmeiser, Ralph Kothe, Bronek Boszczyk, Oliver Heese, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi, Anna MacDowall, Claes Olerud, Nikolaos Paidakakos, Anastasios Panagiotou and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Revision surgery in cervical spine.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Luca PapaveroClinic for Spine Surgery, Schoen Clinic Hamburg Eilbek, Hamburg, Germany.
Gregor SchmeiserClinic for Spine Surgery, Schoen Clinic Hamburg Eilbek, Hamburg, Germany.
Ralph KotheClinic for Spine Surgery, Schoen Clinic Hamburg Eilbek, Hamburg, Germany.
Bronek BoszczykSpine Center, Benedictus Hospital, Tutzing, Germany.
Oliver HeeseSpine Center, Schoen Clinic Munich Harlaching, München, Germany.
Yoshiharu KawaguchiOrthopedic Surgery, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Anna MacDowallOrthopedic Department, Uppsala, Sweden.
Claes OlerudOrthopedic Department, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nikolaos PaidakakosSpine Center, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Anastasios PanagiotouSpine Center, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Tobias PitzenSpine Center, SRH-Clinic, Karlsbad-Langensteinbach, Germany.
Marcus RichterSpine Center, St. Josefs-Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany.
K Daniel RiewUniversity Medical Center, Spine Division, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Aaron StevensonSpinal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Lee TanUniversity Medical Center, Spine Division, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Ryo UeshimaOrthopedic Surgery, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Y H YauSpinal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Michael MayerSpine Center, Schoen Clinic Munich Harlaching, München, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Arthrose-Hilfe e.V
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo validate with a prospective study a decision-supporting coding system for the surgical approach for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy.

methodsTen cases were presented on an internet platform, including clinical and imaging data. A single-approach (G1), a choice between 2 (G2), or 3 approaches (G3) were options. Senior and junior spine surgeons analyzed 7 parameters: location and extension of the compression of the spinal cord, C-spine alignment and instability, general morbidity and bone diseases, and K-line and multilevel corpectomy. For each parameter, an anterior, posterior, or combined approach was suggested. The most frequent letter or the last letter (if C) of the resulting 7-letter code (7LC) suggested the surgical approach. Each surgeon performed 2 reads per case within 8 weeks.

resultsG1: Interrater reliability between junior surgeons improved from the first read (κ = 0.40) to the second (κ = 0.76, p < 0.001) but did not change between senior surgeons (κ = 0.85). The intrarater reliability was similar for junior (κ = 0.78) and senior (κ = 0.71) surgeons. G2: Junior/senior surgeons agreed completely (58%/62%), partially (24%/23%), or did not agree (18%/15%) with the 7LC choice. G3: junior/senior surgeons agreed completely (50%/50%) or partially (50%/50%) with the 7LC choice.

conclusionThe 7LC showed good overall reliability. Junior surgeons went through a learning curve and converged to senior surgeons in the second read. The 7LC helps less experienced surgeons to analyze, in a structured manner, the relevant clinical and imaging parameters influencing the choice of the surgical approach, rather than simply pointing out the only correct one.

Indexed as

Anterior approachCombined approachDegenerative cervical myelopathyMulticenter studyPosterior approach

Identifiers

PMID31284334
PMCPMC7136109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.