Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31284326›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2019

Particle therapy for prostate cancer: The past, present and future.

Hitoshi Ishikawa, Hiroshi Tsuji, Shigeyuki Murayama, Mikio Sugimoto, Nobuo Shinohara, Satoru Maruyama, Motohiro Murakami, Hiroki Shirato, Hideyuki Sakurai

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Carbon-ion radiotherapy for urological cancers.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy?Cancer research and treatment · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hitoshi IshikawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hiroshi TsujiHospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Shigeyuki MurayamaDivision of Proton Therapy, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Mikio SugimotoDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan.
Nobuo ShinoharaDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Satoru MaruyamaDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Motohiro MurakamiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hiroki ShiratoGlobal Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hideyuki SakuraiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPKagawa University · JPNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JP

Funding

AMED JP18ck0106241h0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although prostate cancer control using radiotherapy is dose-dependent, dose-volume effects on late toxicities in organs at risk, such as the rectum and bladder, have been observed. Both protons and carbon ions offer advantageous physical properties for radiotherapy, and create favorable dose distributions using fewer portals compared with photon-based radiotherapy. Thus, particle beam therapy using protons and carbon ions theoretically seems suitable for dose escalation and reduced risk of toxicity. However, it is difficult to evaluate the superiority of particle beam radiotherapy over photon beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer, as no clinical trials have directly compared the outcomes between the two types of therapy due to the limited number of facilities using particle beam therapy. The Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology organized a joint effort among research groups to establish standardized treatment policies and indications for particle beam therapy according to disease, and multicenter prospective studies have been planned for several common cancers. Clinical trials of proton beam therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer and carbon-ion therapy for high-risk prostate cancer have already begun. As particle beam therapy for prostate cancer is covered by the Japanese national health insurance system as of April 2018, and the number of facilities practicing particle beam therapy has increased recently, the number of prostate cancer patients treated with particle beam therapy in Japan is expected to increase drastically. Here, we review the results from studies of particle beam therapy for prostate cancer and discuss future developments in this field.

Indexed as

Disease-Free SurvivalHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicProstateProstatic NeoplasmsProton TherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicbiochemical relapse-free survivalcarbon-ion radiotherapyprostate cancerproton beam therapytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID31284326
PMCPMC6852578
OpenAlexW2956524906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.