Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31283775›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Does chemotherapy improve survival in patients with nodal positive luminal A breast cancer? A retrospective Multicenter Study.

Daniel Herr, Manfred Wischnewsky, Ralf Joukhadar, Olivia Chow, Wolfgang Janni, Elena Leinert, Visnja Fink, Tanja Stüber, Carolin Curtaz, Rolf Kreienberg and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel HerrDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Würzburg University Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1145-094X
Manfred WischnewskyFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Ralf JoukhadarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Würzburg University Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany.
Olivia ChowDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Würzburg University Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany.
Wolfgang JanniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany.
Elena LeinertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany.
Visnja FinkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany.
Tanja StüberDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Würzburg University Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany.
Carolin CurtazDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Würzburg University Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany.
Rolf KreienbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany.
Maria BlettnerInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Daniel WollschlägerInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Achim WöckelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Würzburg University Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study based on the BRENDA data, we investigated the impact of endocrine ± chemotherapy for luminal A, nodal positive breast cancer on recurrence free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, we analysed if tumor size of luminal A breast cancer influences survival in patients with the same number of positive lymph nodes.

methodsIn this retrospective multi-centre cohort study data of 1376 nodal-positive patients with primary diagnosis of luminal A breast cancer during 2001-2008 were analysed. The results were stratified by therapy and adjusted by age, tumor size and number of affected lymph nodes.

resultsIn our study population, patients had a good to excellent prognosis (5-year RFS: 91% and tumorspecific 5-year OS 96.5%). There was no significant difference in RFS stratified by patients with only endocrine therapy and with endocrine plus chemo-therapy. Patients with 1-3 affected lymph nodes had no significant differences in OS treated only with endocrine therapy or with endocrine plus chemotherapy, independent of tumor size. Patients with large tumors and more than 3 affected lymph nodes had a significant worse survival as compared to the small tumors. However, despite the worse prognosis of those, adjuvant chemotherapy failed in order to improve RFS.

conclusionsAccording to our data, nodal positive patients with luminal A breast cancer have, if any, a limited benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor size and nodal status seem to be of prognostic value in terms of survival, however both tumor size as well as nodal status were not predictive for a benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID31283775
PMCPMC6613686
OpenAlexW2958646147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.