Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31283408›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2019

Late Health Outcomes After Contemporary Lymphome Malin de Burkitt Therapy for Mature B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Matthew J Ehrhardt, Yan Chen, John T Sandlund, Elizabeth C Bluhm, Robert J Hayashi, Kerri Becktell, Wendy M Leisenring, Monika L Metzger, Kirsten K Ness, Kevin R Krull and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Haematologica · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew J EhrhardtSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Yan ChenUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
John T SandlundSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Elizabeth C BluhmGeorge Washington University, Washington, DC.
Robert J HayashiWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Kerri BecktellMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Wendy M LeisenringFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Monika L MetzgerSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Kirsten K NessSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Kevin R KrullSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Kevin C OeffingerDuke University, Durham, NC.
Todd M GibsonSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Mitchell S CairoNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY.
Thomas G GrossNational Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Leslie L RobisonSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Gregory T ArmstrongSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Yutaka YasuiSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Melissa M HudsonSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Daniel A MulrooneySt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USDuke University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USGeorge Washington University · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USNational Cancer Institute · USNew York Medical College · USUniversity of Alberta · CAWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Mach-LETSGO: Machine-LEarning of Treatment, Survey, and Genetics towards Obtaining Correct Classification of Chronic Conditions in Adult Survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study - CCSS SupplU24CA055727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Gregory Armstrong · 1999 to 2026
$96.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS U24 CA055727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe widely used, risk-based Lymphome Malin de Burkitt (LMB) chemotherapy regimen has improved survival rates for children with mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); however, associated late effects remain understudied. We assessed late health outcomes after LMB treatment in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. PATIENTS AND

methodsMultivariable regression models compared chronic health conditions, health status, and socioeconomic and neurocognitive outcomes between survivors of NHL treated with the LMB regimen (n = 126), survivors of NHL treated with non-LMB regimens (n = 444), and siblings (n = 1,029).

resultsLMB survivors were a median age of 10.2 years (range, 2.5 to 20.5 years) at diagnosis and 24.0 years (range, 10.3 to 35.3 years) at evaluation. Compared with siblings, LMB survivors were at increased risk for adverse health outcomes. However, survivors of NHL treated with LMB and non-LMB regimens did not differ with regard to risk of having any chronic health conditions, impaired health status, neurocognitive deficits, or poorer socioeconomic outcomes. Increased risk for the following specific neurologic conditions was observed in LMB survivors compared with non-LMB survivors: epilepsy (relative risk [RR], 15.2; 95% CI, 3.1 to 73.4); balance problems (RR, 8.9; 95% CI, 2.3 to 34.8); tremors (RR, 7.5; 95% CI, 1.9 to 29.9); weakness in legs (RR, 8.1; 95% CI, 2.5 to 26.4); severe headaches (RR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.3); and prolonged arm, leg, or back pain (RR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.2 to 7.1). The survivors from the group C LMB risk group (n = 50) were at the highest risk for these conditions; however, except for worse functional status (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.8), they were not at increased risk for other adverse health status or socioeconomic outcomes compared with non-LMB survivors.

conclusionSurvivors treated with LMB and non-LMB regimens are largely comparable in late health outcomes except for excess neurotoxicity among LMB survivors. These data inform treatment efforts seeking to optimize disease control while minimizing toxicity.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCancer SurvivorsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMaleRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31283408
PMCPMC7001792
OpenAlexW2957076795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.