Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31283063›Full record

ArticleJournal of internal medicine2019

The advantages of UK Biobank's open-access strategy for health research.

M Conroy, J Sellors, M Effingham, T J Littlejohns, C Boultwood, L Gillions, C L M Sudlow, R Collins, N E Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Consent and its discontents: the case of UK Biobank.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M ConroyUK Biobank, Cheadle, Stockport, UK.
J SellorsUK Biobank, Cheadle, Stockport, UK.
M EffinghamUK Biobank, Cheadle, Stockport, UK.
T J LittlejohnsUK Biobank, Cheadle, Stockport, UK.
C BoultwoodUK Biobank, Cheadle, Stockport, UK.
L GillionsUK Biobank, Cheadle, Stockport, UK.
C L M SudlowUK Biobank, Cheadle, Stockport, UK.
R CollinsUK Biobank, Cheadle, Stockport, UK.
N E AllenUK Biobank, Cheadle, Stockport, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1938-5038

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/1996001/9454Cancer Research UKDepartment of HealthMedical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ready access to health research studies is becoming more important as researchers, and their funders, seek to maximize the opportunities for scientific innovation and health improvements. Large-scale population-based prospective studies are particularly useful for multidisciplinary research into the causes, treatment and prevention of many different diseases. UK Biobank has been established as an open-access resource for public health research, with the intention of making the data as widely available as possible in an equitable and transparent manner. Access to UK Biobank's unique breadth of phenotypic and genetic data has attracted researchers worldwide from across academia and industry. As a consequence, it has enabled scientists to perform world-leading collaborative research. Moreover, open access to an already deeply characterized cohort has encouraged both public and private sector investment in further enhancements to make UK Biobank an unparalleled resource for public health research and an exemplar for the development of open-access approaches for other studies.

Indexed as

Access to InformationBiomedical ResearchPublic HealthAdultAgedBiological Specimen BanksFemaleHumansInternational CooperationMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUnited Kingdomepidemiologypublic healthscience

Identifiers

PMID31283063
PMCPMC6790705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.