Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31282965›Full record

ArticleSouthern medical journal2019

Effect of Local Smoke-Free Ordinances on Smoking Prevalence in Kentucky, 2002-2009.

W Jay Christian, Courtney J Walker, Bin Huang, Ellen J Hahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Southern medical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Identifying risk factors for adverse lung health outcomes among rural Appalachian women.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Non-Smoker's Exposure to Second-Hand Smoke in South Africa during 2017.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  6. "Youth Are More Aware and Intelligent than Imagined": The Mountain Air Youth Photovoice Project.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

W Jay ChristianFrom the Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, the Markey Cancer Center, College of Medicine, and BREATHE, College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Courtney J WalkerFrom the Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, the Markey Cancer Center, College of Medicine, and BREATHE, College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Bin HuangFrom the Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, the Markey Cancer Center, College of Medicine, and BREATHE, College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Ellen J HahnFrom the Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, the Markey Cancer Center, College of Medicine, and BREATHE, College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington.

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Jennifer F Rogers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMany local communities in Kentucky, a state with one of the highest smoking prevalence rates in the United States, have enacted smoke-free ordinances that prohibit smoking in workplaces and enclosed buildings open to the public. Research has shown that such ordinances are clearly beneficial for public health, but their influence on smoking prevalence in the populations they cover remains unclear. This study explores the effect of local smoke-free ordinances on smoking prevalence in Kentucky.

methodsWe used a database of smoke-free ordinances maintained by the Kentucky Center for Smoke-Free Policy, Kentucky Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey data, and US Census data. We estimated the proportion of Kentucky adults living in counties with smoke-free ordinances of varying strength; examined bivariate associations between smoke-free ordinances and smoking prevalence; and fit regression models that adjusted for various county-level demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors.

resultsSmoking prevalence was approximately 5% lower in counties with smoke-free ordinances, even after adjusting for other relevant factors, including a trend in decreasing prevalence throughout the study region. There was a slight dose-response effect related to the strength of smoke-free ordinances after adjustment for these covariates. Smoke-free ordinances appear to have a modest effect on smoking prevalence across the span of several years.

conclusionsFindings demonstrate that although smoking prevalence fell throughout the state during the study period, counties with smoke-free ordinances experienced a greater decline. Future research should examine the strength of smoke-free ordinances in greater detail to better understand their influence on smoking prevalence.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansKentuckyMalePrevalenceSmoke-Free PolicySmokingSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31282965
PMCPMC6687407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.