ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2019
High-Throughput Segmentation of Tiled Biological Structures using Random-Walk Distance Transforms.
Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review of image segmentation techniques for biomedical micro-CT: from laboratory absorption imaging to synchrotron phase-contrast.Npj imaging · 2026Review
- Mineralized sclerites in the gorgonian coralProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Growth of a Tessellation: Geometric rules for the Development of Stingray Skeletal Patterns.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Comparative architecture of the tessellated boxfish (Ostracioidea) carapace.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Ontogeny of a tessellated surface: Carapace growth of the longhorn cowfish Lactoria cornuta.Journal of anatomy · 2022Article
- The Structure and First-Passage Properties of Generalized Weighted Koch Networks.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Mean Hitting Time for Random Walks on a Class of Sparse Networks.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Endoskeletal mineralization in chimaera and a comparative guide to tessellated cartilage in chondrichthyan fishes (sharks, rays and chimaera).Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020Article
- Image analysis pipeline for segmentation of a biological porosity network, the lacuno-canalicular system in stingray tesserae.MethodsX · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various 3D imaging techniques are routinely used to examine biological materials, the results of which are usually a stack of grayscale images. In order to quantify structural aspects of the biological materials, however, they must first be extracted from the dataset in a process called segmentation. If the individual structures to be extracted are in contact or very close to each other, distance-based segmentation methods utilizing the Euclidean distance transform are commonly employed. Major disadvantages of the Euclidean distance transform, however, are its susceptibility to noise (very common in biological data), which often leads to incorrect segmentations (i.e., poor separation of objects of interest), and its limitation of being only effective for roundish objects. In the present work, we propose an alternative distance transform method, the random-walk distance transform, and demonstrate its effectiveness in high-throughput segmentation of three microCT datasets of biological tilings (i.e., structures composed of a large number of similar repeating units). In contrast to the Euclidean distance transform, the random-walk approach represents the global, rather than the local, geometric character of the objects to be segmented and, thus, is less susceptible to noise. In addition, it is directly applicable to structures with anisotropic shape characteristics. Using three case studies-tessellated cartilage from a stingray, the dermal endoskeleton of a starfish, and the prismatic layer of a bivalve mollusc shell-we provide a typical workflow for the segmentation of tiled structures, describe core image processing concepts that are underused in biological research, and show that for each study system, large amounts of biologically-relevant data can be rapidly segmented, visualized, and analyzed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.