Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31282926›Full record

ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2019

High-Throughput Segmentation of Tiled Biological Structures using Random-Walk Distance Transforms.

Daniel Baum, James C Weaver, Igor Zlotnikov, David Knötel, Lara Tomholt, Mason N Dean

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Mineralized sclerites in the gorgonian coralProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Growth of a Tessellation: Geometric rules for the Development of Stingray Skeletal Patterns.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel BaumDepartment of Visual Data Analysis, Zuse Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
James C WeaverWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Igor ZlotnikovB CUBE-Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
David KnötelDepartment of Visual Data Analysis, Zuse Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lara TomholtWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Mason N DeanMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Department of Biomaterials, Research Campus Golm, Potsdam, Germany.
Harvard University · USZuse Institute Berlin · DEMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various 3D imaging techniques are routinely used to examine biological materials, the results of which are usually a stack of grayscale images. In order to quantify structural aspects of the biological materials, however, they must first be extracted from the dataset in a process called segmentation. If the individual structures to be extracted are in contact or very close to each other, distance-based segmentation methods utilizing the Euclidean distance transform are commonly employed. Major disadvantages of the Euclidean distance transform, however, are its susceptibility to noise (very common in biological data), which often leads to incorrect segmentations (i.e., poor separation of objects of interest), and its limitation of being only effective for roundish objects. In the present work, we propose an alternative distance transform method, the random-walk distance transform, and demonstrate its effectiveness in high-throughput segmentation of three microCT datasets of biological tilings (i.e., structures composed of a large number of similar repeating units). In contrast to the Euclidean distance transform, the random-walk approach represents the global, rather than the local, geometric character of the objects to be segmented and, thus, is less susceptible to noise. In addition, it is directly applicable to structures with anisotropic shape characteristics. Using three case studies-tessellated cartilage from a stingray, the dermal endoskeleton of a starfish, and the prismatic layer of a bivalve mollusc shell-we provide a typical workflow for the segmentation of tiled structures, describe core image processing concepts that are underused in biological research, and show that for each study system, large amounts of biologically-relevant data can be rapidly segmented, visualized, and analyzed.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsAnimal ShellsBivalviaCartilageImaging, Three-DimensionalSkates, FishStarfishX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID31282926
PMCPMC6907396
OpenAlexW2958947625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.