Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31282286›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2020

An integrative sparse boosting analysis of cancer genomic commonality and difference.

Yifan Sun, Zhengyang Sun, Yu Jiang, Yang Li, Shuangge Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yifan SunCenter for Applied Statistics, School of Statistics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7437-6244
Zhengyang SunCenter for Applied Statistics, School of Statistics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
Yu JiangSchool of Public Health, University of Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Yang LiCenter for Applied Statistics, School of Statistics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6287-5094
Shuangge MaCenter for Applied Statistics, School of Statistics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9001-4999

Funding

Novel methods for identifying genetic interactions in cancer prognosisR01CA204120 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Shuangge Ma · 2016 to 2026
$3.5M
Assisted Network-based Analysis of Cancer Gene Expression StudiesR03CA216017 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, SHUANGGE · 2017 to 2018
$168k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204120NCI NIH HHS R03 CA216017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cancer research, high-throughput profiling has been extensively conducted. In recent studies, the integrative analysis of data on multiple cancer patient groups/subgroups has been conducted. Such analysis has the potential to reveal the genomic commonality as well as difference across groups/subgroups. However, in the existing literature, methods with a special attention to the genomic commonality and difference are very limited. In this study, a novel estimation and marker selection method based on the sparse boosting technique is developed to address the commonality/difference problem. In terms of technical innovation, a new penalty and computation of increments are introduced. The proposed method can also effectively accommodate the grouping structure of covariates. Simulation shows that it can outperform direct competitors under a wide spectrum of settings. The analysis of two TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) datasets is conducted, showing that the proposed analysis can identify markers with important biological implications and have satisfactory prediction and stability.

Indexed as

GenomicsNeoplasmsComputer SimulationHumanscancer genomicscommonality and differenceIntegrative analysissparse boosting

Identifiers

PMID31282286
PMCPMC7471599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.