ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2020
An integrative sparse boosting analysis of cancer genomic commonality and difference.
Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian Modeling of Cancer Outcomes Using Genetic Variables Assisted by Pathological Imaging Data.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Biomarker-guided heterogeneity analysis of genetic regulations via multivariate sparse fusion.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In cancer research, high-throughput profiling has been extensively conducted. In recent studies, the integrative analysis of data on multiple cancer patient groups/subgroups has been conducted. Such analysis has the potential to reveal the genomic commonality as well as difference across groups/subgroups. However, in the existing literature, methods with a special attention to the genomic commonality and difference are very limited. In this study, a novel estimation and marker selection method based on the sparse boosting technique is developed to address the commonality/difference problem. In terms of technical innovation, a new penalty and computation of increments are introduced. The proposed method can also effectively accommodate the grouping structure of covariates. Simulation shows that it can outperform direct competitors under a wide spectrum of settings. The analysis of two TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) datasets is conducted, showing that the proposed analysis can identify markers with important biological implications and have satisfactory prediction and stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.