Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31282058›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

A multiparametric analysis of white matter maturation during late childhood and adolescence.

Bryce L Geeraert, Robert Marc Lebel, Catherine Lebel

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Spatiotemporal white-matter development across early childhood.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Energy drinks at adolescence: Awareness or unawareness?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bryce L GeeraertBiomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Robert Marc LebelAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute and the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Catherine LebelAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute and the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0344-4032

Funding

CIHRNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White matter development has been well described using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), but the microstructural processes driving development remain unclear due to methodological limitations. Here, using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), inhomogeneous magnetization transfer (ihMT), and multicomponent driven equilibrium single-pulse observation of T1/T2 (mcDESPOT), we describe white matter development at the microstructural level in a longitudinal cohort of healthy 6-15 year olds. We evaluated age and gender-related trends in fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), neurite density index (NDI), orientation dispersion index (ODI), quantitative ihMT (qihMT), myelin volume fraction (VF

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsAnisotropyBody WaterChildDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLinear ModelsMaleMyelin SheathNeuritesOrgan SizeReference ValuesSex Characteristicsbrain developmentdiffusion tensor imagingmagnetic resonance imagingmyelin sheathwhite matter

Identifiers

PMID31282058
PMCPMC6865527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.