Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31282031›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2019

What drives phenotypic divergence among coral clonemates of Acropora palmata?

Meghann K Durante, Iliana B Baums, Dana E Williams, Sam Vohsen, Dustin W Kemp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assisted Gene Flow Yields Physiologically RobustEvolutionary applications · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Coral evolutionary responses to microbial symbioses.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meghann K DuranteThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Iliana B BaumsThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6463-7308
Dana E WilliamsNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, FL, USA.
Sam VohsenThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Dustin W KempThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9396-1518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary rescue of populations depends on their ability to produce phenotypic variation that is heritable and adaptive. DNA mutations are the best understood mechanisms to create phenotypic variation, but other, less well-studied mechanisms exist. Marine benthic foundation species provide opportunities to study these mechanisms because many are dominated by isogenic stands produced through asexual reproduction. For example, Caribbean acroporid corals are long lived and reproduce asexually via breakage of branches. Fragmentation is often the dominant mode of local population maintenance. Thus, large genets with many ramets (colonies) are common. Here, we observed phenotypic variation in stress responses within genets following the coral bleaching events in 2014 and 2015 caused by high water temperatures. This was not due to genetic variation in their symbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodinium "fitti") because each genet of this coral species typically harbours a single strain of S. "fitti". Characterization of the microbiome via 16S tag sequencing correlated the abundance of only two microbiome members (Tepidiphilus, Endozoicomonas) with a bleaching response. Epigenetic changes were significantly correlated with the host's genetic background, the location of the sampled polyps within the colonies (e.g., branch vs. base of colony), and differences in the colonies' condition during the bleaching event. We conclude that long-term microenvironmental differences led to changes in the way the ramets methylated their genomes, contributing to the differential bleaching response. However, most of the variation in differential bleaching response among clonemates of Acropora palmata remains unexplained. This research provides novel data and hypotheses to help understand intragenet variability in stress phenotypes of sessile marine species.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaStress, PhysiologicalAnimalsAnthozoaCoral ReefsDinoflagellidaDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticFloridaMicrosatellite RepeatsPhenotypeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSymbiosisRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAcropora palmatacoral bleachingepigeneticmethylationmicrobiomemicroenvironmentplasticity

Identifiers

PMID31282031
PMCPMC6852117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.