ArticleMolecular ecology2019
What drives phenotypic divergence among coral clonemates of Acropora palmata?
Article in Molecular ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assisted Gene Flow Yields Physiologically RobustEvolutionary applications · 2026Article
- 2023 global heatwave causes mass mortality of a keystone coral on shallow Western Atlantic reefs.iScience · 2025Article
- Spatially restricted coral bleaching as an ecological manifestation of within-colony heterogeneity.Communications biology · 2025Review
- Coral microbiomes are structured by environmental gradients in deep waters.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Multi-Chemical Omics Analysis of the SymbiodiniaceaeMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Phenotypic plasticity for improved light harvesting, in tandem with methylome repatterning in reef-building corals.Molecular ecology · 2024Article
- Mixed Patterns of Intergenerational DNA Methylation Inheritance in Acropora.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Building consensus around the assessment and interpretation of Symbiodiniaceae diversity.PeerJ · 2023Article
- Article
- The Role of DNA Methylation in Genome Defense in Cnidaria and Other Invertebrates.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Naturally occurring fire coral clones demonstrate a genetic and environmental basis of microbiome composition.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Defining Coral Bleaching as a Microbial Dysbiosis within the Coral Holobiont.Microorganisms · 2020Review
- Coral evolutionary responses to microbial symbioses.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Review
- Early Life Stages of a Common Broadcast Spawning Coral Associate with Specific Bacterial Communities Despite Lack of Internalized Bacteria.Microbial ecology · 2020Article
- Deep-sea corals provide new insight into the ecology, evolution, and the role of plastids in widespread apicomplexan symbionts of anthozoans.Microbiome · 2020Article
- What drives phenotypic divergence among coral clonemates of Acropora palmata?Molecular ecology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evolutionary rescue of populations depends on their ability to produce phenotypic variation that is heritable and adaptive. DNA mutations are the best understood mechanisms to create phenotypic variation, but other, less well-studied mechanisms exist. Marine benthic foundation species provide opportunities to study these mechanisms because many are dominated by isogenic stands produced through asexual reproduction. For example, Caribbean acroporid corals are long lived and reproduce asexually via breakage of branches. Fragmentation is often the dominant mode of local population maintenance. Thus, large genets with many ramets (colonies) are common. Here, we observed phenotypic variation in stress responses within genets following the coral bleaching events in 2014 and 2015 caused by high water temperatures. This was not due to genetic variation in their symbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodinium "fitti") because each genet of this coral species typically harbours a single strain of S. "fitti". Characterization of the microbiome via 16S tag sequencing correlated the abundance of only two microbiome members (Tepidiphilus, Endozoicomonas) with a bleaching response. Epigenetic changes were significantly correlated with the host's genetic background, the location of the sampled polyps within the colonies (e.g., branch vs. base of colony), and differences in the colonies' condition during the bleaching event. We conclude that long-term microenvironmental differences led to changes in the way the ramets methylated their genomes, contributing to the differential bleaching response. However, most of the variation in differential bleaching response among clonemates of Acropora palmata remains unexplained. This research provides novel data and hypotheses to help understand intragenet variability in stress phenotypes of sessile marine species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.