Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31282005›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied behavior analysis2020

A translational evaluation of potential iatrogenic effects of single and combined contingencies during functional analysis.

Billie J Retzlaff, Wayne W Fisher, Jessica S Akers, Brian D Greer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prevalence of Error Types of Synthesized Contingency Assessments.Behavior analysis (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Functional Analysis Decision-Making Considerations.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. On the Evidence for Interactive Effects During and Following Synthesized Contingency Assessments.Behavioral interventions : theory & practice in residential & community-based clinical programs · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Billie J RetzlaffUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center.
Wayne W FisherUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center.
Jessica S AkersUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center.
Brian D GreerUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center.

Funding

Basic and Clinical Studies in Reinforcing Positive Behaviors in Intellectual and Developmental DisabilitiesR01HD093734 · NICHD · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Timothy A Shahan · 2018 to 2026
$5.2M
Stimulus Control Refinements of Functional Communication Training in IDR01HD079113 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI FISHER, WAYNE WILLIAM · 2014 to 2023
$4.5M
Preventing relapse of destructive behavior using behavioral momentum theoryR01HD083214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI FISHER, WAYNE WILLIAM · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079113NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083214NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research suggests that combining putative reinforcers for problem behavior into a single, synthesized contingency may increase efficiency in identifying behavioral function relative to traditional functional analysis (FA). Other research suggests potential shortcomings of synthesized contingency analysis (SCA), such as the potential for false-positive outcomes. In prior comparisons of traditional FAs and SCAs, investigators could not ascertain with certainty the true function(s) of the participants' problem behavior for use as the criterion variable. We conducted a translational study to circumvent this limitation by training a specific function for a surrogate destructive behavior prior to conducting a traditional FA and SCA. The traditional FA correctly identified the previously established function of the target response in all six cases and produced no iatrogenic effects. The SCA produced differentiated results in all cases and iatrogenic effects (i.e., an additional function) in three of six cases. We discuss these findings in terms of the mechanisms that may promote iatrogenic effects.

Indexed as

AggressionChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIatrogenic DiseaseMaleProblem BehaviorReinforcement, PsychologySelf-Injurious Behaviorbehavioral assessmentfunctional analysisiatrogenic effectsinduction of novel functionssynthesized contingency analysis

Identifiers

PMID31282005
PMCPMC6944780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.