Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31281563›Full record

ArticleScanning2019

No-Reference Quality Assessment Method for Blurriness of SEM Micrographs with Multiple Texture.

Hui Wang, Xiaojuan Hu, Hui Xu, Shiyin Li, Zhaolin Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scanning, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hui WangSchool of Information and Control Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0627-9295
Xiaojuan HuSchool of Physics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5037-4615
Hui XuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4188-022X
Shiyin LiSchool of Information and Control Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9635-7079
Zhaolin LuAdvanced Analysis and Computation Centre, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9251-0758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) plays an important role in the intuitive understanding of microstructures because it can provide ultrahigh magnification. Tens or hundreds of images are regularly generated and saved during a typical microscopy imaging process. Given the subjectivity of a microscopist's focusing operation, blurriness is an important distortion that debases the quality of micrographs. The selection of high-quality micrographs using subjective methods is expensive and time-consuming. This study proposes a new no-reference quality assessment method for evaluating the blurriness of SEM micrographs. The human visual system is more sensitive to the distortions of cartoon components than to those of redundant textured components according to the Gestalt perception psychology and the entropy masking property. Micrographs are initially decomposed into cartoon and textured components. Then, the spectral and spatial sharpness maps of the cartoon components are extracted. One metric is calculated by combining the spatial and spectral sharpness maps of the cartoon components. The other metric is calculated on the basis of the edge of the maximum local variation map of the cartoon components. Finally, the two metrics are combined as the final metric. The objective scores generated using this method exhibit high correlation and consistency with the subjective scores.

Identifiers

PMID31281563
PMCPMC6589194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.