Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31281491›Full record

ArticleTheranostics2019

Regularized reconstruction of digital time-of-flight

Elin Lindström, Irina Velikyan, Naresh Regula, Ali Alhuseinalkhudhur, Anders Sundin, Jens Sörensen, Mark Lubberink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theranostics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reduction of [EJNMMI physics · 2024
    Article
  6. Comparison of Digital versus AnalogDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Comparison ofEuropean journal of hybrid imaging · 2022
    Article
  12. Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Moving the goalposts while scoring-the dilemma posed by new PET technologies.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Optimization of [EJNMMI physics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elin LindströmDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Irina VelikyanDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Naresh RegulaDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ali AlhuseinalkhudhurDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anders SundinDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jens SörensenDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mark LubberinkDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate localization of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) is critical, especially if curative therapy is intended. With the aim to optimize target-to-background uptake ratio in

Indexed as

Membrane GlycoproteinsOrganometallic CompoundsAgedGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective Studiesgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesMembrane GlycoproteinsOrganometallic CompoundsRadiopharmaceuticals68Ga-PSMA-11BSREMimage reconstructioninterobserver variability.PET/CTprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID31281491
PMCPMC6587171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.