ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Expression levels and significance of miR-184 and miR-126 in burned rats.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Mucous miRomics in Cynoglossus semilaevis Related to Vibrio harveyi Caused Infection.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expression levels and significance of miR-184 and miR-126 in burned rats were investigated. A total of 30 healthy rats were selected to construct a burn rat model, and another 10 healthy rats as the control group. The modeled rats were divided into groups I, II and III according to burn area, 10 for each group. The reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-q.PCR) was used to detect the expression of miR-184 and miR-126 in the serum of three groups of burned rats, and ELISA was employed to detect the expression levels in peripheral blood and the correlation. There was no difference in the expression levels of miR-184 and miR-126 among the four groups of rats before modeling (P>0.05). Those of miR-184 and miR-126 at each time point were lower than those at the previous one in groups I, II and III (P<0.05). There was no significant change in the expression levels of miR-184 and miR-126 in the control group (P>0.05). At the same time point, those of miR-184 and miR-126 decreased with the increase of burn degree, and the difference was statistically significant between every two groups (P<0.05). The results of Pearson's correlation analysis revealed that the expression level of miR-184 was positively correlated with that of miR-126 (r=0.832, P=0.002). miR-184 and miR-126 were positively correlated with burn degree (r=0.901, P=0.001, r=0.775, P=0.001) and time after burn (r=0.732, P=0.004, r=0.753, P=0.002). The expression levels of miR-184 and miR-126 decrease in burned rats. The changes of their levels may be used as a reference standard for clinical efficacy evaluation to evaluate burn degree, preventing burn wounds from deepening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.