Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31281270›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2019

Consequences of

Joseph P Jarvis, Arul Prakasam Peter, Jeffrey A Shaman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of real-world evidence on the clinical relevance, characterization, and utility ofJournal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. StarTRAC-Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Determination of the DuplicatedJournal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Pharmacogenomics in Psychiatry Practice: The Value and the Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. CYP2D6 pharmacogenetics and phenoconversion in personalized medicine.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. CYP2D6 genetic variation in Ugandans.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph P JarvisCoriell Life Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Arul Prakasam PeterCoriell Life Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Jeffrey A ShamanCoriell Life Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Coriell Institute For Medical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacogenomics represents a potentially powerful enhancement to the current standard of care for psychiatric patients. However, a variety of biological and technical challenges must be addressed in order to provide adequate clinical decision support for personalized prescribing and dosing based on genomic data. This is particularly true in the case of

Indexed as

copy-number variationcytochrome P450 CYP2D6gene deletiongene duplicationspersonalized medicinepharmacogenomicsprecision medicinepsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID31281270
PMCPMC6595891
OpenAlexW2950318474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.