Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31281223›Full record

ArticleActa medica Lituanic2019

ECCO

Lina Grauslytė, Gonzalo De La Cerda, Tomas Jovaiša

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta medica Lituanic, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lina GrauslytėDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Kauno Klinikos Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Gonzalo De La CerdaQueen's Hospital, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals Trust NHS London, United Kingdom.
Tomas JovaišaQueen's Hospital, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals Trust NHS London, United Kingdom.
Barking, Havering And Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEnd-of-life decisions are often time consuming and difficult for everyone involved. In some of these cases extracorporeal life support systems could potentially be used not only as a bridge to treatment but as a tool to buy time to allow patient's participation in decision making and to avoid further futile invasive procedures. CASE REPORT: A previously healthy 53-year-old female patient presented with respiratory failure of unknown cause. In the course of treatment her condition was deemed irreversible and the only option for any chance of long-term survival was a lung transplant. During this whole time the patient's condition was managed with extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal system (ECCO DISCUSSION: In cases of end-of-life decisions, time can play an essential role. Even though extracorporeal life support systems have been conceptualised to be a bridge to treatment, they could be beneficial in a situation when time is needed to make a decision. ECCO

conclusionsOur case report demonstrated that ECCO

Indexed as

ECCO2Rend of lifeextracorporeal supportrespiratory failure

Identifiers

PMID31281223
PMCPMC6586378
OpenAlexW2944183910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.