Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31281217›Full record

ArticleActa medica Lituanic2019

Pain management in intensive care unit patients after cardiac surgery with sternotomy approach.

Baiba Vilīte, Eva Strīķe, Katrīna Rutka, Roberts Leibuss

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta medica Lituanic, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05518266 (Ultrasound-guided Versus Surgeon Delivered Post-incisional Parasternal Block in Adult Patients Undergoing Open Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05518266 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Ultrasound-guided Versus Surgeon Delivered Post-incisional Parasternal Block in Adult Patients Undergoing Open Cardiac Surgery: Are They the Same?

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled88ConditionsParasternal Intercostal Nerve BlockArmsUS-guided Parasternal block, Surgeon-delivered parasternal block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Baiba VilīteDepartment of Cardio-anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, Rīga, Latvia.
Eva StrīķeDepartment of Cardio-anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, Rīga, Latvia.
Katrīna RutkaDepartment of Cardio-anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, Rīga, Latvia.
Roberts LeibussDepartment of Cardio-anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, Rīga, Latvia.
Riga Stradiņš University · LV

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative pain is a common problem among intensive care patients. Pain management includes pain assessment and documentation, patient care, and pharmacological treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study used a prospective, cross-sectional design. Nineteen intensive care nurses and 72 intensive care patients after cardiac surgery with sternotomy approach were studied. Toronto Pain Management Inventory was used to assess nurses and the 2010 Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire was used to assess the patients. A research protocol was used to document pharmacological treatment data and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain measurements. The pharmacological therapy data was available for 72 patients, but patient satisfaction measurements were acquired from 52 patients.

resultsPostoperative pain for intensive care patients after cardiac surgery is mostly mild (68.66%). Pain intensity had a tendency to decrease over time, from a mean VAS score of 4.66 two hours after extubation to a mean VAS score of 3.12 twelve hours after extubation. Mostly opioids (100%) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, 77.8%) were used for pharmacological treatment, and treatment was adjusted according to pain levels and patient needs. Patient satisfaction regarding pain management in the first 24 hours after surgery was high (94.2%), even though the nurses' pain knowledge was average (

conclusionsAn individualized pain management plan requires pain documentation and ensures high patient satisfaction. Pain levels after cardiac surgery with sternotomy approach are mostly mild and patient satisfaction is high.

Indexed as

cardiac surgeryintensive carepain management nursingpostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID31281217
PMCPMC6586389
OpenAlexW2943916322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.