Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31280815›Full record

ArticleApplied ergonomics2019

Care coordination for chronically ill patients: Identifying coordination activities and interdependencies.

Sarah Kianfar, Pascale Carayon, Ann Schoofs Hundt, Peter Hoonakker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied ergonomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah KianfarUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, United States. Electronic address: sarah.kianfar@gmail.com.
Pascale CarayonUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, United States.
Ann Schoofs HundtUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, United States.
Peter HoonakkerUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, United States.

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Care coordination is important for chronically ill patients who need assistance from a variety of healthcare professionals especially when they transition through different care settings. There has not been a clear definition of care coordination and its associated activities. This paper provides a two-dimension framework of care coordination for chronically ill patients: 1) coordination activities (i.e. communication and monitoring) and 2) interdependencies (i.e. flow, shared resources, simultaneity). We used this framework in a qualitative content analysis of 12 interviews with healthcare professionals involved in coordinating care of chronically ill patients. We identified a total of 258 care coordination activities and developed categories and sub-categories using the constant comparative method. The first category of care coordination activities involves communication with flow or shared resources interdependencies or both. This category includes arranging services and equipment for the patient, exchanging information about patient transition to different care settings, reporting errors and resolving them, and helping the patient with appointments and transportation. The second category involves monitoring, sometimes combined with communication, with flow or shared resources interdependencies or both. This category includes reviewing medications and services and detecting errors, reviewing patient symptoms and following up if needed, and scheduling follow-up to review patient status. The last category involves communication with simultaneity interdependency. This category involves talking in the same location and developing a plan of care, people exchanging information at the same time, and scheduling delivery of medications/services to correspond with patient arrival home. Finally, we identified characteristics of health information technology that can support these various care coordination activities.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseCommunicationHealth PersonnelHumansPatient CarePatient Care PlanningQualitative ResearchCare coordinationChronically ill patientsCoordination activityHealth information technologyInterdependencyPatient journey

Identifiers

PMID31280815
PMCPMC8610785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.