Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31280418›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2020

A novel approach using 3-D printing in the Irish National Centre for pelvic and acetabular surgery.

Colum Downey, Cathleen McCarrick, Christopher Fenelon, Evelyn P Murphy, Brendan J O'Daly, Michael Leonard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colum DowneyDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, 24, Ireland. columdowney@rcsi.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6594-5732
Cathleen McCarrickDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, 24, Ireland.
Christopher FenelonDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, 24, Ireland.
Evelyn P MurphyDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, 24, Ireland.
Brendan J O'DalyDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, 24, Ireland.
Michael LeonardDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, 24, Ireland.
Tallaght University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplex pelvic fractures present the orthopaedic surgeon with many challenges. 3-D printed models may provide assistance in pre-operative planning, may lead to improvements in intra-operative (i) decision making and (ii) efficiencies (time reduction, blood loss reduction, screening reduction) and may result in improvements in post-operative outcomes (fracture reduction & quality of life). The models also provide hands-on opportunities for orthopaedic trainees and patients. This may result in improvements in (i) education/training regarding the management of pelvic and acetabular fractures for orthopaedic trainees and (ii) improvements in patient consenting and overall patient satisfaction.

designSingle-centre, two orthopaedic surgeons (pelvic and acetabular fellowship trained), prospective observational study. Twenty patients with acute displaced pelvic/acetabular fracture(s); ten 3-D-printed pelvis and ten non-printed cases for comparison. The comparison cohorts were matched for fracture classification, sex and age. OUTCOME MEASURES: Classification assistance, intra-operative time, estimated blood loss, screening amount, post-operative reduction and infection, EQ-5D-5L, teaching/educational assistance and pre-operative counselling.

resultsThe models provided more information regarding fracture pattern, however, this did not result in change of CT-planned approach/procedure or patient outcomes. The models scored highly on surgeon's questionnaire. The models were found to have a positive impact on trainee education and patient consenting/counselling. With regard to objective comparisons, there was no significant improvements in time-to-surgery, intra-operative time, estimated blood loss, screening amount, fracture reduction or infection rate. There was no significant difference in quality of life questionnaire ~ 12 months post-surgery (statistical tests used; Cohen's effect size and Fisher's exact test).

conclusionsWhilst the authors recognize the positive subjective findings with respect to the use of 3-D printing in pelvic and acetabular trauma in our National Centre, objective findings were lacking.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalAcetabulumAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFracture FixationFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedPelvic BonesPostoperative PeriodPreoperative CareProspective Studies3-D printingAcetabulumPelvicTechnologyTrauma

Identifiers

PMID31280418
OpenAlexW2953433353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.